In a new filing issued by federal labor prosecutors this week, the labor board is alleging that Starbucks’s refusal to bargain with unionized stores in the Pacific Northwest constitutes illegal anti-union activity in the first of what could be many similar complaints to come.
Labor officials wrote in their complaint, filed on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) general counsel, that the company “has been failing and refusing to bargain collectively” with stores across Oregon and Washington that have unionized as part of Starbucks Workers United’s historic campaign over the past year. The complaint was first reported on by Bloomberg.
The complaint says that the company should be forced to bargain with the union and that Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz should be forced to attend a reading of workers’ rights, with labor officials, union representatives and workers present.
“This complaint proves what workers have been saying all along — Starbucks is dragging their feet [at] the negotiating table and refusing to bargain with us in good faith,” Michelle Eisen, Starbucks Workers United leader, said in a statement.
This is the first time that the labor board has issued a complaint against the company for refusing to bargain with multiple stores. Last month, the labor board ruled that the company illegally failed to negotiate with its hometown roastery in Seattle, and that it must begin negotiations with the union.
The labor board may issue similar complaints soon, as the union has filed multiple complaints over the company’s refusal to bargain. Workers have expressed frustration about the lack of bargaining after waiting months for a bargaining date, as the company has stonewalled negotiations in many locations and company representatives have walked out of sessions after just minutes of being in the room.
Although it’s illegal for companies to refuse to bargain in good faith with union representatives, it’s typical for companies to drag out the process; according to an analysis last year by Bloomberg Law, it takes over 400 days on average for both parties to sign a collective bargaining agreement after the formation of a union.
It’s unclear as of yet if Starbucks will stretch this timeline longer, though the negotiating process alone often takes months. Meanwhile, some stores’ unions — none of which have a first contract — are now over a year old.
“By year’s end we will have appeared in-person for more than 75 single-store bargaining sessions,” Starbucks representative Rachel Wall said in response to the NLRB filing. But workers have said that several stores have had multiple bargaining sessions in which company representatives left before hearing a single demand.
Violating the law appears to be a tactic frequently employed by Starbucks to discourage workers from unionizing. According to the union, the NLRB has issued 50 complaints against the company, encompassing over 1,000 violations of federal labor laws.
“This is why we say Starbucks is the worst violator of federal labor law in modern US history,” the union wrote in a tweet last week. “[Schultz], [board Chair Mellody Hobson] and the Starbucks board have no respect for their workers and clearly no respect for the law.”
Workers have launched multiple national strikes in protest of the company’s refusal to bargain with workers and its continued anti-union tactics.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.