In the latest move in Starbucks’s fierce anti-union campaign across the country, the company has closed a unionized store in South Carolina after a manager filed kidnapping and assault charges against workers — charges that the union calls “false and absurd.”
Last week, workers in Anderson, South Carolina, confronted their manager with a list of demands, including fixing equipment in the store and providing unionizing stores with the same wage raises that the company is offering to non-union stores, as shown in a TikTok posted by Starbucks Workers United that has garnered over 7.6 million views.
The video shows workers confronting their manager with the letter in the store as the manager is on the phone with corporate. In an audio recording of the incident heard by Truthout, the manager asks if they can leave, and the workers say “yes.”
But after the manager pushed employees and exited the store, the manager contacted the local police and filed kidnapping and assault charges against the workers. Now, the company has closed the store down, suspended the workers indefinitely and forced them to take paid time off. They have also banned workers from entering any Starbucks location.
The union condemned the charges and store closure, saying that the moves clearly constitute union busting.
“These charges are false and absurd. The Anderson Starbucks workers were demanding better working conditions in their store and in no way, shape, or form, did they attempt or prevent the manager from leaving the store,” the union wrote in a press release. “Starbucks has put the workers on paid time off, suspending them indefinitely, and banned them from visiting any Starbucks location. Stabucks also closed down the store.”
Starbucks Workers United is filing charges of illegal union busting against the company, which has closed multiple unionized stores and fired dozens of pro-union employees. Starbucks is currently being prosecuted by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) for over 200 unfair labor practice charges related to the company’s campaign to shut down the union effort in Buffalo, New York, where the movement began.
In May, workers at the Anderson location became the first in the South to unanimously win their union vote, and have since gone on strike multiple times demanding higher wages and better working conditions. Workers say that, since they unionized, the company has been slashing their hours in “a blatant act of retaliation” against the union. They have also brought up issues with their cold brew machine and a malfunctioning sticker printer, which they say is slowing down service.
Starbucks has said that it can’t offer workers the same wage raises if they’re in the midst of a union campaign, claiming that it would constitute a “unilateral change” to workers’ conditions, which is in violation of federal labor laws. Labor law experts and the union say that this isn’t true, and that discriminatorily applying wage raises is the actual violation of labor laws.
To further elucidate the point, Workers United President Lynne Fox, who oversees the union that Starbucks Workers United is part of, wrote in a letter to Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz last week that the union waives any objection it may have to giving unionizing workers the wage raise, essentially removing the company’s legal cover for its plan. “Workers United knows that these statements are misleading at best and false at worst,” Fox wrote.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.