US Embassy Tel Aviv / Flickr)” width=”637″ height=”424″ />Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US Secretary of State John Kerry in Israel. (Photo: US Embassy Tel Aviv / Flickr)
It was bad enough that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected Secretary of State John Kerry’s proposal to end the violence in Gaza. Now Kerry has been subjected to withering criticism in Israel for seriously trying to end the violence.
We’ve seen this movie before. Netanyahu has thumbed his nose at the Obama administration because he believed he could count on Congress, including Democrats, to undermine the administration.
But the thing is, we know that this movie could have a different ending than the Obama administration backing down under Israeli pressure. If enough Americans urged Kerry to continue to “stand tall,” he would.
If that seems unrealistic to you, just think what’s happened in the last few years on US policy toward Iran. The people who are now demanding that the United States march in lockstep with Netanyahu on resolving the Gaza crisis are the same people who demanded that the United States march in lockstep with Netanyahu on the question of Iran’s nuclear program. These people have failed so far in their efforts to blow up the US-Iran negotiations because enough Democrats rallied behind the administration to thwart the efforts of the Netanyahu amen corner to sabotage diplomacy.
If we could do this on US policy towards Iran, why couldn’t we do this with respect to ending the violence in Gaza and lifting the economic blockade?
In particular, Kerry has been slammed in Israel for including Turkey and Qatar in the negotiations. This is because including Turkey and Qatar in the negotiations is widely seen in Israel as signifying two things: 1) indirectly bringing Hamas to the table for negotiations to end the violence and 2) trying to lift the economic blockade of Gaza as part of an agreement.
Many of the times we’ve won on moving US policy toward diplomacy with Iran in the last few years happened when we weighed in with Congress on the side of the Obama administration when there was a split between the administration and the Israeli government. That’s what’s happening now: a split between the Obama administration and the Israeli government. We need to weigh in with Congress now. If we don’t weigh in with Congress, Netanyahu will think that he can pressure Kerry to abandon his efforts by turning to Congress to undermine Kerry.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy