Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Sins, Both Moral and Intellectual

If inflation had in fact risen, they would have claimed vindication.

When the going gets tough, the people losing the argument start whining about civility. I often find myself attacked as someone who believes that anyone with a different opinion is a fool or a knave. As I’ve tried to explain, however, this is mainly about selection bias. I don’t spend much time on areas where reasonable people can disagree, because there are so many important issues where one side really is completely unreasonable.

Obviously someone can disagree with my side and still be a good person. On the other hand, there are a lot of bad people engaged in economic debate – and I don’t mean that they’re wrong; I mean that they’re arguing in bad faith.

Which brings us to today’s installment of oh-yes-they’re-that-bad, courtesy of Bloomberg. You may remember the infamous open letter from 2010 addressed to Ben Bernanke, then chairman of the Federal Reserve, warning that his efforts to boost the economy “risk currency debasement and inflation.” Just in case you were wondering about the political nature of the letter, among the 23 signatories was that noted monetary expert William Kristol, editor of the conservative Weekly Standard.

(Image: TUNIN; Russia / CartoonArts International / The New York Times Syndicate)(Image: TUNIN; Russia / CartoonArts International / The New York Times Syndicate)Earlier this month, reporters at Bloomberg had the bright idea, now that almost four years of low inflation have passed, of asking the signatories whether they would concede that they were wrong. Not a chance. Hey, they only said there was a “risk” of inflation, and the economy hasn’t done well, so it’s all good!

Just to say the obvious: If inflation had in fact risen, they would have claimed vindication. So it’s heads they win, tails they don’t lose.

And this is far from the only example of inflationistas and bond worriers bobbing and weaving, refusing to acknowledge having said what they said and being completely unwilling to admit mistakes.

I try hard not to behave that way. If I make a mistake – like my extreme pessimism about the short-term survival of the euro, or my warnings back in 2003 about a debt crisis in the United States – I try to admit it, and figure out why I was wrong. No doubt there have been times when I rewrote history to make myself look better, but I try to avoid that – it’s a major intellectual and moral sin.

And, boy, are there a lot of sinners out there.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy