In a big win for Democrats and digital rights advocates, the Senate approved a resolution on Wednesday that would restore popular net neutrality rules for internet service providers at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) by a vote of 52 to 47.
Democrats see net neutrality as a potent wedge issue ahead of the midterm elections and were united behind the resolution, which would reverse the FCC’s December order repealing its own net neutrality rules. Republicans, Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana and Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, defected from the GOP to give Democrats the votes needed to pass the resolution with a simple majority.
The FCC’s net neutrality rules, which are scheduled to be replaced by much weaker requirements on June 11, prevent internet service providers like AT&T and Comcast from blocking, slowing or prioritizing web content. For Democrats, passing the resolution is a rare legislative victory in a Congress that is controlled by the GOP and has embraced the Trump administration’s deregulatory agenda.
“Only in Washington is this controversial, largely due to the influence of high-paid lobbyists for big cable and telecommunications companies like Comcast, Verizon, and AT&T,” said Chris Lewis, vice president of the digital rights group Public Knowledge, in a statement.
The resolution faces an uphill battle in the House, where the GOP holds a powerful majority. However, pressuring lawmakers to take up the resolution could force vulnerable Republican incumbents to either buck the deregulatory party line or take an unpopular position with the midterms looming.
Since taking over Congress and the White House, Republicans have quietly worked to dismantle net neutrality and other Obama-era telecom regulations, but recent polling shows that a clear majority of voters — including a majority of Republicans — want strong net neutrality protection and oppose the FCC repeal.
“House Republican don’t have to choose the same path that the vast majority of Republicans in the Senate chose,” said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer during a press conference after the vote. “Speaker Ryan should bring this resolution up for a vote immediately because it’s too much of an important issue to shelve.”
If their resolution fails in the House, Democrats hope internet users will punish the GOP in the midterms for siding with the telecom industry over consumers. Democrats are also using net neutrality to brand themselves as tech-savvy and pro-consumer on an issue that appeals to younger voters.
Speaking before the Senate ahead of the vote, resolution sponsor Sen. Ed Markey (D-Massachusetts) said the only supporters of the FCC decision to kill net neutrality are the telecom lobbyists and their friends in the GOP.
“The public is telling us loud and clear to vote for this resolution,” Markey said. “They are telling us that they don’t trust their internet service providers to show up on time for a customer service appointment at their house, so they certainly don’t trust them to put consumers ahead of profits.”
More than 20 states have sued the FCC over the repeal, which digital rights advocates fear could empower internet service providers to maximize profits by shaping what content consumers see and how quickly they can access certain websites.
Internet service providers have long opposed the original FCC net neutrality rules because they classified the internet as a “common carrier” service that everyone needs to use, which gives the FCC greater power to regulate providers on behalf of consumers. Big providers have also pledged not to violate net neutrality if left unregulated, but digital rights advocates say consumers should not trust them.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.