Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) is urging Republicans to call on Elon Musk to testify before the Senate labor committee in order to probe who in the Trump administration is truly in charge, as the Senate continues advancing cabinet picks in spite of Musk seemingly being behind most major decisions.
In remarks on the nomination of President Donald Trump’s labor secretary pick, Lori Chavez-DeRemer, in the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, Sanders said that he opposes Chavez-DeRemer’s nomination — but that it hardly matters who is in the cabinet with Musk at large.
The labor secretary should be someone who protects workers’ rights and the interests of working people, with tens of millions workers subject to “starvation wages” and an increasingly huge gulf between the rich and the working class, Sanders said. And yet, the person making decisions related to labor and other issues facing working people is instead the richest person on earth, he said.
“The most important point of this hearing is, let me be very clear: Today, we are not voting on who the next Secretary of Labor is. The next Secretary of Labor, the next Secretary of Education, the next Secretary of Housing, the next Secretary of the Treasury is Elon Musk. And let us understand that reality and not play along with this charade,” Sanders said.
“Does anyone here really think that any Secretary of Labor, any Secretary of Education, is going to make decisions by himself or herself?” he asked.
Indeed, as the senator pointed out, Musk held an outsized presence at Trump’s first cabinet meeting of his second term on Wednesday. Musk is not a cabinet-level official — in fact, his title as a special government employee means that he is only supposed to work for 130 days in a calendar year and underwent less vetting than normal federal employees.
And yet, Musk spoke more than any of the official cabinet members, and when he was not speaking, Trump often referred to him as someone advising him on major decisions like laying off a million federal workers.
At one point, Trump said: “Is anybody unhappy with Elon?” Trump asked. “If you are, we’ll throw them out of here.”
“Let’s be honest. The American people understand it, and it’s time that we understood it as well. If you want to discuss policies in the Department of Labor, let’s bring in the real secretary,” Sanders said. “Mr. Chairman, I respectfully request that this committee bring Elon Musk before this committee so that we can really hear what’s going on with the government.”
The committee ultimately voted 14 to 9 to advance Chavez-DeRemer’s nomination, with three Democrats joining Republicans in voting in her favor.
Sanders voted “no.” Labor advocates have noted that, while Chavez-DeRemer was one of the few Republicans to support the pro-union Protecting the Right to Organize Act when she was a House member, she also falls in line with Republicans’ anti-worker views — supporting anti-union “right to work” laws.
Musk, meanwhile, wants to shut down federal labor regulation entirely. After years of his companies being investigated by labor regulators for numerous alleged labor violations, Musk’s SpaceX filed a lawsuit last year attempting to shutter the National Labor Relations Board, the country’s top labor regulator.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have until midnight tonight to add 132 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.