Skip to content Skip to footer

Sanders Blasts Parliamentarian’s Ruling Dropping Wage Hike From COVID Bill

Sanders lambasted Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough’s decision that the wage raise was against the rules.

Senate Budget Committee Chairman Bernie Sanders arrives for a hearing on Capitol Hill examining wages at large profitable corporations on February 25, 2021, in Washington, D.C.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) and several other Democratic lawmakers are lambasting a decision by the Senate parliamentarian, a nonpartisan referee in that legislative body, who determined on Thursday that a provision to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour in the COVID economic relief package does not align with the rules for the reconciliation process.

But while Democrats appear upset over the decision, the party may be disunited on what path they should take next to raise the minimum wage.

Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough determined that including the wage raise in the $1.9 trillion relief bill did not comport with Senate rules. If the provision is not included in the package, which is set to be voted on soon, any hopes for raising the wage to $15 an hour would require a standalone bill, pending no challenges come about to MacDonough’s decision.

It would be harder to garner votes to pass a separate bill, as it would require 60 votes in the Senate to overcome threats of a filibuster from Republicans and even some centrist Democrats.

In a statement regarding the decision by MacDonough, the White House said that President Joe Biden, who advocated for inclusion of the $15 minimum wage in the bill, was “disappointed,” but also believed Congress should “move quickly to pass” the relief package, which includes $1,400 payments to every American.

Other Democratic leaders appeared to be expressing similar sentiments. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s statement about the decision showed no signs of plans to fight MacDonough’s conclusion.

“We are deeply disappointed in this decision,” Schumer said. “We are not going to give up the fight to raise the minimum wage to $15 to help millions of struggling American workers and their families. The American people deserve it, and we are committed to making it a reality.”

Sanders wrote in his own statement that he was in strong disagreement with the parliamentarian’s ruling, believing that the wage raise was in line with the rules of reconciliation.

“The [Congressional Budget Office] made it absolutely clear that raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour had a substantial budgetary impact and should be allowed under reconciliation,” he said in his statement.

Sanders also pointed out that polling on the subject demonstrated Americans overwhelmingly want a $15 an hour minimum wage. With the president, the House, and possibly the Senate in agreement with the idea, there was no excuse not to pass it, he said.

“Yet because of the archaic and undemocratic rules of the Senate we are unable to move forward to end starvation wages in this country and raise the income of 32 million struggling Americans,” Sanders added.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California) also blasted the decision from the parliamentarian, writing in her own statement that the House would still pass a reconciliation bill with the wage raise included.

“House Democrats believe that the minimum wage hike is necessary,” she said. “Therefore, this provision will remain in the American Rescue Plan on the Floor [on Friday].”

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Washington) wrote a series of tweets criticizing the decision, too.

“Let’s be clear: raising the minimum wage is COVID relief. The White House and Senate leadership can and should still include the minimum wage increase in the bill,” Jayapal said. “We can’t allow the advisory opinion of the unelected parliamentarian to stand in the way.”

There are ways to get around the parliamentarian’s decision — indeed, Vice President Kamala Harris has the authority to overrule MacDonough’s conclusion. But so far, it’s unclear whether Harris will take that route or not, and the White House has not signaled what it plans to do on the matter. There has not been a move to overturn a Senate parliamentarian’s decision since the 1970s.

Jayapal also called for reforms to the Senate as a result of the parliamentarian’s conclusion in the matter.

“The ruling only makes it more clear that the Senate must reform its archaic rules, including reforming the filibuster to allow populist and necessary policies like the $15 minimum wage to pass with a majority of the Senate,” she said.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy