Manchester, New Hampshire – No matter what happens in Iowa, Mitt Romney has a safety net in New Hampshire.
And that could rank as the year's most perilous sentence. Why shouldn't Romney be surprised in the state that temporarily derailed Barack Obama's supposedly rapid march toward nomination four years ago? Hillary Clinton humbled many a pundit here in 2008, reason enough to challenge the rapidly jelling conventional wisdom about the Republican presidential campaign.
In just a few weeks, Romney has been transformed from an embattled and weak front-runner into the real thing. He has a chance of winning the Iowa caucuses on Jan. 3 as his dazed opponents scratch at each other trying to emerge as the leading non-Romney. Libertarian Ron Paul, who will never be nominated, now looks to be Romney's main competition in Iowa. Paul is doing a fine job as Romney's blocking back, preventing anyone else from emerging early enough to give Romney a stiff race.
The key to wrapping up a nomination quickly has always been an Iowa-New Hampshire one-two punch, and the Granite State, which votes on Jan. 10, seems to be a Romney fortress. Romney's headquarters here on Elm Street was bustling with activity on Tuesday night, as if Iowa didn't matter. Leaving nothing to chance, Romney made campaign stops that day in Londonderry and Portsmouth before he left for his final Iowa push. If Iowa is Romney's venture capital, New Hampshire is his nest egg.
“I don't see anyone challenging Romney for the win,” said Fergus Cullen, the former New Hampshire state Republican chairman, referring to his state. “Second place,” he adds, “is still wide open,” a consolation only if Romney heads toward the GOP's Southern contests weaker than he looks now.
Steve Duprey, the Republican national committeeman who, like Cullen, is neutral (though Susan Duprey, his politically influential wife, is a close adviser to Romney's wife Ann), sees Romney and Paul as having the strongest New Hampshire organizations — precisely what Iowa Republicans say about ground strength in their state. By contrast, he says, Newt Gingrich has little going on organizationally — his headquarters down the street from Romney's was a quiet enclave on Tuesday — and is depending almost entirely on enthusiastic support from the Manchester Union Leader, the state's legendary conservative daily. One of the mysteries of the contest is how the Union Leader might pivot if Gingrich stumbles in Iowa.
Former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman has “a great professional organization,” Steve Duprey said, but also a core problem: “He started running as a moderate and now he's saying he's a conservative. That's confusing.” Indeed, Huntsman, who is skipping Iowa, now wants to become the conservative alternative to Romney and Gingrich.
Hoping that repetition is persuasive, Huntsman's television and print ads here tout him as “a conservative hero in this race,” “more conservative than Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney combined,” and the author of “the most conservative” program. Pulling together moderate independents and dissatisfied conservatives is the magic Huntsman is betting on.
If everything seems to be going Romney's way, here is a word of caution from an unexpected source. Former Gov. John Sununu is one of Romney's staunchest supporters in the state, but also a tested veteran of many a New Hampshire primary. “People have to understand that primary races are extremely volatile because all the candidates are expressing more or less the same philosophy,” this professor of realpolitik explained to me. “So primary races are often won or lost by nuances or small mistakes.” One of Sununu's greatest political triumphs came in 1988, when he helped engineer a turn in the primary's last days away from Bob Dole and toward his candidate, George H.W. Bush, with an eleventh-hour ad attacking Dole for “straddling” on taxes.
So what could possibly upend Romney? There are two debates scheduled for the weekend before the voting here. They present Romney with an opportunity to wrap things up — and a minefield of potential troubles. Or Iowa could anoint a new conservative alternative to Romney: A Rick Santorum surge or a Rick Perry comeback could create a new one-on-one dynamic here. Or Romney could simply fall far short of what are now soaring expectations in Iowa.
Still, what's most astounding is that a Republican contest characterized all year by melodrama and comedy now seems headed toward the most conventional and predictable conclusion possible. It's hard to believe things will really end this way. The biggest upset would be no upset at all.
Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One
Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.
Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.
Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.
As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.
And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.
In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.
We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.
We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $81,000 in one-time donations and to add 1250 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.
Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.
If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!
With gratitude and resolve,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy