Skip to content Skip to footer

Riots Sweep UK as Fascist Influencers Use Stabbing Attack to Fuel Racist Rampage

Racist political rhetoric laid the groundwork for the far right rampage against immigrants, Muslims and Black people.

Anti-immigration protesters riot outside the Holiday Inn Express in Manvers, which is being used as an asylum hotel, on August 4, 2024, in Rotherham, United Kingdom.

Racist mobs continued their rampage through the U.K. this weekend, throwing bricks, setting fires, smashing windows, threatening mosques and attacking hotels housing asylum seekers.

The street-fighting fascist mobs, disproportionately made up of young, white men, have targeted Black people and Muslims, chanting anti-immigrant slogans and embracing much of the same language as was used in the U.S. by neo-Nazi protesters at the infamous 2017 “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.

The explosion of far right violence against asylum seekers and Muslims came as fascists spread a frenzy of misinformation on social media in the wake of a mass stabbing committed by a teenager born in Cardiff, Wales, who was in fact neither Muslim nor an asylum seeker.

The stabbing, took place last Monday, and was committed by a knife-wielding 17-year-old in the English town of Southport. By the time he was stopped by police, three young girls at a yoga-dance and yoga class had been fatally wounded, several more children were in critical condition, and two adults who tried to intervene were also seriously injured. It was a truly horrific event, redolent of the mass-shooting sprees that have so bedeviled the U.S. in recent years.

But then, the already awful situation suddenly got even worse. Within minutes of the killings, rumors began circulating online that the attacker was either a Muslim or an undocumented immigrant or both. And, in quick succession far right mobs descended first on the mourning town of Southport, and then, within days, on central London and several other cities, including Liverpool, Manchester, Bristol, Hull, Nottingham and Belfast in Northern Ireland. They have, in the week since, targeted mosques, hotels housing asylum seekers and then the police. The violent attacks have now spread to more than a dozen cities, with hundreds arrested and with the government so concerned that Yvette Cooper, the new home secretary, is reportedly considering introducing emergency legislation to try to reimpose public order on a rapidly metastasizing situation, and prime minister Keir Starmer, himself a former crown prosecutor, has warned the racist mobs that the full force of the law will be brought against them. Earlier today, Starmer and Cooper participated in a COBRA meeting – COBRA being the committee used to bring key government and national security players together during national emergencies – and promised to unleash a “standing army” of specialist officers against the rightwing mob.

But it will take more than just riot police to defuse a situation that has gotten entirely out of control in large part because of the extraordinary speed with which misinformation now circulates through social media. It will also take a concerted effort to hold social media companies accountable for the lies spread on their sites, and it will take a serious effort by the courts and other institutions to counter this misinformation in real time. Late last week, the judge presiding over the case of the arrested 17-year-old, attempted to do just that: in an effort to defuse the social media rumor mill around the murders in Southport, he allowed the media to reveal the teenager’s name and origin. His name, it turns out, is Axel Muganwa Rudakubana. He was born in Cardiff, Wales, to parents who themselves were of Rwandan origin: he isn’t an undocumented immigrant, he isn’t an asylum-seeker, he isn’t a Muslim.

If Rudakubana were white, I suspect that discourse throughout the U.K. would surely be more focused on providing better mental health and social service interventions to people who are at risk of hurting themselves or others. I suspect that more people would be talking and writing about how we are all interconnected, and how when we neglect the well-being of one and the provision of vital early intervention services, we risk ricochet effects that can ultimately cause catastrophic damage — as has proven to be the case in Southport.

Instead, Britain’s homegrown fascists have opportunistically used these killings to whip up support for their racist effort to bar immigrants from the U.K. and to terrorize many of those already within the country. As a result, an unfathomable tragedy that ought to have brought communities together in grief has been exploited by violent rioters — heirs to the right-wing football hooligans of the 1980s and 1990s, who engaged in bloody fights for turf and reputation — trying to burn down mosques and hotels for asylees.

This fascist rhetoric hasn’t emerged in a vacuum: for years, the Conservative government deployed inflammatory rhetoric against asylum seekers and undocumented immigrants. They made “stop the boats” a political rallying cry, and they spent a huge amount of political capital attempting to implement a deportation policy whereby a number of asylum seekers would be summarily deported to Rwanda. Anti-immigrant bigotry fueled support for Brexit in 2016, and in the years following, anti-immigrant rhetoric has turbocharged a mean-spirited vision of English nationalism and a hardline version of Conservative Party orthodoxy.

In the parliamentary elections last month, the headline story was the Labour Party’s victory; the secondary story — that may in the long run prove to be more significant — was the rise of Nigel Farage’s hard-right Reform Party, which peeled off nearly half of the Conservative vote with its support for an immigration freeze, and its rhetoric about immigrants causing a cultural decline. For the first time, the Reform Party ended up with elected members of Parliament – five of them. More significantly, it received 14 percent support, more than 4 million votes, and came second in nearly 100 parliamentary constituencies, the vast majority of these being in seats that Labour won.

Labour’s victory masks the fact that in much of the country the 2024 election catapulted Reform into being the de facto party of opposition, and this has triggered an internal reckoning within the Conservative Party that is seeing a significant portion of the party moving ever further rightward and largely embracing Reform Party rhetoric. (While most Conservatives haven’t supported the rioters this week, at least one senior Conservative did come out with a statement that seemed to at least give succor to the far right, arguing that the riots were a “symptom” of mass opposition to migration and of the government’s failure to lower migration levels in the years following Brexit.)

Now a member of Parliament in the U.K., Farage has used his new platform to continue to stir up race hatred, much as the infamous politician Enoch Powell did in the late 1960s, when he warned of “rivers of blood” in British streets as a consequence of mass immigration. Meanwhile, online followers of the paramilitarist anti-immigration organizer Tommy Robinson, whose English Defense League has engaged in violence against immigrants and people of color for years, have used the horrors of Southport to bring far right rioters out onto the streets.

Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, was deplatformed by Twitter in 2018 for his promotion of violence and his dissemination of conspiracy theories. Last year, however, Elon Musk brought him back online. Since then, his ability to mobilize far right mobs has only grown: in late July, he orchestrated a demonstration in the center of London that brought upward of 20,000 flag-waving followers out to Trafalgar Square.

Anti-racist organizers in the U.K., as well as the British government, have argued that this past week’s riots have been facilitated by social media companies’ inability to — or disinterest in — reining in Robinson and his followers. Hope Not Hate has referenced a “blizzard of false information” in the hours following the Southport killings. The result has been disastrous: violent, far right rioting has convulsed the British Isles. But it would be wrong to simply lay the blame for this upheaval at Elon Musk’s feet. Yes, the titans of social media are irresponsible in the extreme for magnifying the toxic messages of people such as Robinson. But the culture of intolerance toward migrants in the U.K. has been a long time in the making, and far too many politicians have been stoking anti-immigrant bigotry as a way to score cheap political points.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy