Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Republicans Threaten to “Go Nuclear” on Filibuster by Thursday

The filibuster could be gone by Friday, after Democrats gained the votes to hold up the nomination of Neil Gorsuch.

The filibuster could be gone — or at least significantly amended — by Friday, after Democrats gained the votes to hold up the nomination of Neil Gorsuch.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has threatened to hold a vote on amending the parliamentary rule — something that would require the support of all but one of his Republican colleagues.

McConnell said on Sunday that Gorsuch will be confirmed to the Supreme Court “this week.” Fox News reported Monday that “senior Republican sources” are claiming “McConnell has the votes” to change Senate procedures.

“It’s likely this will all go down on Thursday with a prospective confirmation vote on Friday evening,” the conservative news outlet claimed.

In 2013, Senate Democrats invoked the so-called “nuclear option” on non-Supreme Court judicial nominees. Former Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) advanced the rule changes after Republicans left dozens of vacancies on lower courts, over the course of President Obama’s first term and into his second one.

The filibuster still applies to legislation and Supreme Court nominees, meaning Justices and bills currently need 61 votes for Senate approval, instead of a simple 51-vote majority.

By Monday, Democrats had conjured the 41 votes they need to force McConnell’s hand. Only four Senate Democrats said they would vote to end debate over the Gorsuch nomination: Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va), Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND), Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.) and Michael Bennet (D-Colo).

Immediately after Trump’s election, it looked unlikely that conservatives would back any move to alter Senate rules. Seven Republican senators went on the record saying they were reluctant to “go nuclear.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) was one of those seven lawmakers. But on Monday he was singing a different tune, warning Democrats that obstruction would be met with procedural alterations.

“Because if we have to, we’re going to change the rules,” Graham said. “I hate that. I really, really do.”

Update: This post was first published before Democrats secured the 41 votes they need to filibuster Gorsuch. It has since been amended to reflect the current whip count.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy