On Wednesday, Republicans in the Senate voted to block a bill that would have provided health care benefits to veterans who have been exposed to toxic burn pits and chemical agents during their time in the military.
Only 55 senators voted to advance the bill, known as the Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act, failing to pass the 60-vote threshold to invoke cloture and overcome the filibuster. All 42 of the votes against advancing the bill came from Republicans; only seven GOP members voted to pass the proposal that advocates said would have been a life-saving victory for veterans.
Advocates for the bill expressed rage and frustration that Republicans blocked the legislation, which Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pennsylvania) claimed they opposed because it contained unrelated spending. Advocates for the bill quickly dismissed those claims.
“This eleventh-hour act of cowardice will actively harm this country’s veterans and their families,” said Sen. Jon Tester (D-Montana), Chair of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee. “Republicans chose today to rob generations of toxic-exposed veterans across this country of the health care and benefits they so desperately need — and make no mistake, more veterans will suffer and die as a result.”
Veterans who were exposed to toxins like Agent Orange or smoke from burn pits, which were commonly used to dispose of waste in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other places, are susceptible to developing respiratory conditions and certain rare cancers.
But veterans have had trouble getting coverage for treating these conditions. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Deputy Executive Director of policy and procedures Laurine Carson told the House in a 2020 hearing that, of the 12,582 veterans who filed claims for these conditions, only 2,828 were approved — or about 20 percent. Overall, the military has estimated that 3.5 million U.S. veterans were exposed to toxins from burn pits, which the military says it no longer uses.
The bill would add nearly two dozen conditions to the VA’s list of conditions related to veterans’ time in the military and open the door for veterans to receive care and disability benefits for those illnesses. It would also provide new benefits for veterans who were exposed to chemicals like Agent Orange, a chemical weapon that inflicts severe full-body effects that the U.S. used in the Vietnam War. An international tribunal later found the use of the chemical to be an illegal act of aggression and a crime against humanity.
The bill passed the House earlier this month, and a previous version of the bill had passed the Senate in June by an 84 to 14 vote. At the time, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) called it the “greatest advance in veterans’ health care in decades.”
Host of The Daily Show Jon Stewart, who lobbied for the bill, expressed frustration that the bill was blocked. “Not one of these stab vets in the back Senators should get to leave for the Summer” until they pass the bill, Stewart tweeted. “Not one.”
Commentators speculated that Republicans voted against the bill on Wednesday night as a knee-jerk reaction to Democrats’ announcement of a rare consensus on their long-vaunted reconciliation bill, which came less than an hour before the vote.
“Republicans decide to take dying vets hostage because Democrats want a minimum tax on corporations and energy investments,” said American Prospect executive editor David Dayen on Twitter. “They’ll give you a lot of other reasons, Toomey’s latest is a shift from discretionary to mandatory spending that was already in the bill before. But the real reason is ‘[Sen.] Joe Manchin made us mad.’”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.