Skip to content Skip to footer

Reporters Blast Wall Street Journal for Publishing Misleading Trump Op-Ed

The move was seen as an insult to journalists within the publication, who have fact-checked Trump numerous times.

Former President Donald Trump speaks at a rally on September 25, 2021, in Perry, Georgia.

Several journalists have condemned The Wall Street Journal for publishing an op-ed by former President Donald Trump peddling lies about the veracity of the 2020 presidential election — including some journalists at the newspaper itself, who have worked diligently to fact-check the former president in their own work.

Trump’s letter, which was published on Wednesday in response to an opinion piece written by the Journal’s editorial board, contained numerous falsehoods about the 2020 election. But the newspaper allowed his missive to be printed nonetheless, essentially lending credence to the former president’s misleading commentary and flat-out lies.

“The election was rigged, which you, unfortunately, still haven’t figured out,” Trump wrote in his opinion piece, directed toward the Journal itself.

Much of the piece focused specifically on the election outcome in Pennsylvania, with Trump placing blame on former Attorney General William Barr for his loss, claiming that he ordered a U.S. attorney to “stand down and not investigate election irregularities” in the state. Barr has denied doing this, pointing out that he told federal attorneys across the country that they could pursue claims of fraud just days after the election took place.

The op-ed drew the ire of journalists, many of whom said that granting the former president a platform to promote his erroneous claims was dangerous.

“Most newspapers don’t allow op-ed writers to just make up nonsense lies. Apparently the Wall Street Journal is not among them,” wrote HuffPost White House correspondent S.V. Dáte.

Trump’s op-ed “is full of absolute lies – from the first bullet point down,” opined Jonathan Tamari, national politics writer at The Philadelphia Inquirer.

Conservative columnist Charlie Sykes also chastised The Wall Street Journal for its decision, saying, “You know, the WSJ was not obligated to run this farrago of lies. That was a choice.”

Noah Bookbinder, president of the nonprofit government watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, explained how allowing Trump to proselytize his lies in a paper with the reach of the Journal was a dire miscalculation, one that could carry with it heavy consequences:

Publishing a letter from Donald Trump filled with clearly false and utterly unsupported claims that the 2020 election was beset by widespread fraud is dangerous. Trump’s false claims already helped incite violence, and this could encourage more.

The Wall Street Journal has so far declined to comment on why it chose to publish Trump’s rant.

But journalists from within the Journal, who work separately from the opinion department, were also critical of the department’s decision. Speaking anonymously about the issue, one reporter noted that much of their work correcting the record and publishing the truth was being undone.

“I think it’s very disappointing that our opinion section continues to publish misinformation that our news side works so hard to debunk,” that reporter said, according to CNN. “They should hold themselves to the same standards we do!”

Another reporter from the Journal didn’t expressly criticize the organization, but shared a tweet disparaging the publication from The Daily Beast’s Matt Fuller, stating that “newspapers don’t exist so that powerful people can publish whatever lies they want.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.