Skip to content Skip to footer

Study: Racism Plays Bigger Role in Black-White Infant Mortality Gap Than Wealth

While mortality rates are decreasing each year, the disparity in outcomes between white and Black infants remains.

A Black infant is many times more likely to die within one year of birth than a white infant is, even if that Black infant comes from a wealthy home, a new study shows.

The study, which was published by the National Bureau of Economic Research last month, demonstrates that disparities in Black and white infant mortality rates cannot be explained by economics alone. Rather, racism within the health care industry — both overt and institutional — appears to play a significant role in such outcomes.

The study, conducted in California from 2007 to 2016, examined mortality rates for infants within their first year of life. It is being heralded as the first of its kind to measure disparities in infant mortality rates between Black and white families in conjunction with tax data.

The U.S.’s overall infant mortality rate is devastatingly high compared to other wealthy countries — and outcomes for Black families in the U.S. are far worse than for white families, the study shows.

Among the children who were born to the wealthiest white parents in the study, 173 died within their first year for every 100,000 births. Among white parents with low incomes, 350 infants died for every 100,000 births.

Babies born to white parents with low incomes still had higher survival rates than babies born to the wealthiest of Black parents, who experienced 437 infant deaths for every 100,000 births, according to the study. Outcomes were even worse for Black parents with low incomes, with an infant mortality rate of 653 infants for every 100,000 births.

The data “suggests that the well-documented Black-white gap in infant and maternal health that’s been discussed a lot in recent years is not just explained by differences in economic circumstances. It suggests it’s much more structural,” Maya Rossin-Slater, an author of the study and an economist who specializes in health policy at Stanford, said to The New York Times.

“It’s not race, it’s racism,” University of Wisconsin-Madison public health economist Tiffany L. Green, who was not involved in the study, said of its results. “The data are quite clear that this isn’t about biology. This is about the environments where we live, where we work, where we play, where we sleep.”

Notably, the U.S. is the only wealthy country without universal health care, and is one of the only countries in the world without guaranteed paid family leave.

As the Times reported, there are many documented examples proving that racism exists in the U.S. health care system. While the country’s infant mortality rate is gradually decreasing each year, disparities between Black and white patients remain.

There are also disparities in the treatment of Black and white people who give birth. In an op-ed for Truthout in 2018, parenting and health author Rochaun Meadows-Fernandez detailed her experiences with racism in the health care system after giving birth to her son.

Though she had passed several blood clots and felt “extreme pain” whenever she tried to walk, physicians repeatedly told Meadows-Fernandez that what she was experiencing was normal, with some telling her after tests following her pregnancy that “everything looked fine.” After a month of inaction by her doctors, a physician finally listened to her complaints, eventually discovering that a piece of placenta was still inside her uterus.

“All of a sudden, the medical establishment acknowledged the dangers of the situation I was facing: increased risk for hemorrhaging, infection, and even death,” Meadows-Fernandez wrote.

Even then, physicians continued to ignore other health conditions she was suffering from, dismissing them as regular symptoms after childbirth.

Her treatment was largely the result of systemic racism, Meadows-Fernandez said.

“The lack of cultural competence is so vast within our medical system that there are still professionals who believe Black people have higher pain tolerance than people of other races,” Meadows-Fernandez said. “It is also likely that, like me, other Black women have also sought assistance only to be turned away due to false perceptions of Black women’s fertility or left uncomfortable after being subjected to embarrassment via interrogation.”

“My experiences have shown me just a couple of the many ways in which the reproductive health system ostracizes Black women,” she added. “It is especially important that Black women have access to quality reproductive care because — all too often — our very lives are at stake.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.