Skip to content Skip to footer

Study: Racism Plays Bigger Role in Black-White Infant Mortality Gap Than Wealth

While mortality rates are decreasing each year, the disparity in outcomes between white and Black infants remains.

A Black infant is many times more likely to die within one year of birth than a white infant is, even if that Black infant comes from a wealthy home, a new study shows.

The study, which was published by the National Bureau of Economic Research last month, demonstrates that disparities in Black and white infant mortality rates cannot be explained by economics alone. Rather, racism within the health care industry — both overt and institutional — appears to play a significant role in such outcomes.

The study, conducted in California from 2007 to 2016, examined mortality rates for infants within their first year of life. It is being heralded as the first of its kind to measure disparities in infant mortality rates between Black and white families in conjunction with tax data.

The U.S.’s overall infant mortality rate is devastatingly high compared to other wealthy countries — and outcomes for Black families in the U.S. are far worse than for white families, the study shows.

Among the children who were born to the wealthiest white parents in the study, 173 died within their first year for every 100,000 births. Among white parents with low incomes, 350 infants died for every 100,000 births.

Babies born to white parents with low incomes still had higher survival rates than babies born to the wealthiest of Black parents, who experienced 437 infant deaths for every 100,000 births, according to the study. Outcomes were even worse for Black parents with low incomes, with an infant mortality rate of 653 infants for every 100,000 births.

The data “suggests that the well-documented Black-white gap in infant and maternal health that’s been discussed a lot in recent years is not just explained by differences in economic circumstances. It suggests it’s much more structural,” Maya Rossin-Slater, an author of the study and an economist who specializes in health policy at Stanford, said to The New York Times.

“It’s not race, it’s racism,” University of Wisconsin-Madison public health economist Tiffany L. Green, who was not involved in the study, said of its results. “The data are quite clear that this isn’t about biology. This is about the environments where we live, where we work, where we play, where we sleep.”

Notably, the U.S. is the only wealthy country without universal health care, and is one of the only countries in the world without guaranteed paid family leave.

As the Times reported, there are many documented examples proving that racism exists in the U.S. health care system. While the country’s infant mortality rate is gradually decreasing each year, disparities between Black and white patients remain.

There are also disparities in the treatment of Black and white people who give birth. In an op-ed for Truthout in 2018, parenting and health author Rochaun Meadows-Fernandez detailed her experiences with racism in the health care system after giving birth to her son.

Though she had passed several blood clots and felt “extreme pain” whenever she tried to walk, physicians repeatedly told Meadows-Fernandez that what she was experiencing was normal, with some telling her after tests following her pregnancy that “everything looked fine.” After a month of inaction by her doctors, a physician finally listened to her complaints, eventually discovering that a piece of placenta was still inside her uterus.

“All of a sudden, the medical establishment acknowledged the dangers of the situation I was facing: increased risk for hemorrhaging, infection, and even death,” Meadows-Fernandez wrote.

Even then, physicians continued to ignore other health conditions she was suffering from, dismissing them as regular symptoms after childbirth.

Her treatment was largely the result of systemic racism, Meadows-Fernandez said.

“The lack of cultural competence is so vast within our medical system that there are still professionals who believe Black people have higher pain tolerance than people of other races,” Meadows-Fernandez said. “It is also likely that, like me, other Black women have also sought assistance only to be turned away due to false perceptions of Black women’s fertility or left uncomfortable after being subjected to embarrassment via interrogation.”

“My experiences have shown me just a couple of the many ways in which the reproductive health system ostracizes Black women,” she added. “It is especially important that Black women have access to quality reproductive care because — all too often — our very lives are at stake.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 98 new monthly donors before midnight tonight.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy