Skip to content Skip to footer

With Disability Cuts Likely to Advance in Congress, Progressive Groups Rally to Block Them

Progressive groups are calling on supporters to defend disability benefits.

Progressive groups are calling on supporters to defend disability benefits, as legislation that would roll back the welfare state looks likely to advance in both the House and Senate.

The Coalition on Human Needs on Monday urged like-minded organizations to throw their weight behind a Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities lobbying campaign (CCD) after two bills aimed at tightening the screws on recipients of both Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and unemployment insurance were introduced on the same day earlier this month.

The initiatives, which were proposed on Feb. 12, have the support of Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.). Both men serve as the chairs of the committees that will deal with the legislation.

While the measures are aimed at stamping out what their backers decry as “double-dipping,” CCD said that the payments woven together form an important social safety net for some of the most vulnerable Americans–and one that is rather meager, to boot.

“These extremely modest benefits can be a lifeline to workers with disabilities who receive them, and their families – and as permitted by law are neither ‘double-dipping’ nor improper payments,” a CCD template letter dated Feb. 21 said. “We are deeply concerned by any prospect of worsening the economic security of workers with disabilities and their families.”

The bill Ryan is backing (HR 918) was introduced by Rep. Sam Johnson (R-Texas). It has ten other co-sponsors, all of whom are Republicans.

Hatch’s bill (S.499) has four co-sponsors–Sens. Daniel Coats (R-Ind.), Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), and Tim Scott (R-S.C.). It is likely to attract support from at least one Democrat–a similar piece of legislation proposed by Sen. Jeff Flake on Feb. 3, the Reducing Overlapping Payments Act, is being touted by Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.).

“Those who are on Social Security Disability Insurance are supposed to be unable to work and those on unemployment insurance are supposed to be actively searching for job opportunities,” Manchin, a co-sponsor of the bill, said in a press release issued when it was introduced. “It doesn’t make sense that individuals are allowed to collect these two checks at the same time.”

CCD said, however, that only those with significant disabilities unable to earn more than $1,090 per month in 2015 qualify for SSDI—a sum less than one third of the median American’s usual weekly earnings at the end of last year, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Despite Republicans’ stated goal of reducing the deficit, CCD said that less than one in one hundred Americans receive both SSDI and unemployment insurance, according to a 2012 Government Accountability Office study, and that those benefits, per person, totaled about $1,100 per month in 2010.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.