A petition drive in Nebraska is trying to change the state’s constitution to eliminate the Nebraska State Board of Education and replace it with a new department accountable solely to the governor.
The petition is sponsored by Kelli Brady and Michael Connely, who want to change how the state board of education functions because of its recent attempts to implement more inclusive curricula in health education classes, including discussions on gender identity and sexual orientation.
“It’s been going on for 10 years that they’ve been trying to get this curriculum in, which they don’t need to do,” Brady complained during her explanation of the petition’s intent.
Earlier this year, the state board nixed the LGBTQ+ inclusive proposal after it faced backlash from conservative parents and state residents, even though it could have made a difference to thousands of students.
Advocacy groups and health experts largely agree that inclusive education is beneficial to students overall. According to GLSEN, an education organization that aims to promote inclusion and end discrimination, 81 percent of LGBTQ+ students report being verbally harassed by their peers over the course of a typical school year. More than 58 percent of LGBTQ+ students in public schools also say they experience discriminatory school policies and practices.
Changing the curricula could be life-changing for these students, especially those who face bigotry and hostility from their families at home. Measures like the one proposed by the Nebraska state board not only serve to affirm the experience of LGBTQ+ students, but also to educate their peers. As GLSEN notes on its website, this “can improve the health and well-being of LGBTQ students.”
An assessment by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) came to a similar conclusion. “Creating and sustaining inclusive school environments, policies, programs, and practices that include LGBTQ youth is one strategy for improving the health and academic success of all youth,” the CDC said.
Currently, the Nebraska State Board of Education is an elected body of individuals, with each member selected from a different part of the state.
Brady claims that her and Connely’s proposal for changes to the state board would “give the power back to people that are dealing directly with the children.” But in reality, their plan would transfer a tremendous amount of power to the governor’s office, which would be charged with selecting appointees to an Office of Education.That department would then oversee the 500-plus employees currently working for the State Board of Education.
Jenni Benson, president of the Nebraska State Education Association, warned that the idea proposed by Brady and Connely would “put total power in the hands of the governor.”
Notably, Connely is currently running for governor as a Republican.
For the changes proposed by Brady and Connely to be included on the November 2022 ballot, the petition must attain a minimum of 125,000 signatures by July 7.
Education leaders in the state say the changes are unnecessary, and that they will cause untold harm to students at Nebraska public schools. Maureen Nickels, the current president of the state board, said changes would create “chaos” in the education department. “I think Nebraska really is in good hands with the way we have it,” she said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.