Skip to content Skip to footer

Pelosi Refuses to Back Single Payer, Despite GOP Deathmongering Suddenly Taking Center Stage

While Democrats have shown an interest in saving lives, their leader is wasting an opportunity to advocate for those left uninsured by Obamacare.

(Photo: Michael Fleshman / Flickr)

Democrats are endeavoring to point out that tens of thousands of Americans face a death sentence if House Republicans’ current healthcare plan is signed into law.

“With the repeal of the Affordable Care Act, it is estimated that 43,956 people will die,” Rep. Gwen Moore (D-Wis.) said Thursday morning, on the House floor. “Long live the Republican Party.”

But while Dems have shown an interest in saving lives, their leader is wasting an opportunity to advocate for the 27 million Americans left completely uninsured by Obamacare.

“No, I don’t,” Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) promptly said, when asked by a reporter if she thinks single payer should be in Democrats’ 2018 party platform.

“I was carrying single payer signs probably around before you born, so I understand that aspiration,” the House Minority Leader told Vice’s Evan McMorris-Santoro. She then claimed that “the comfort level with a broader base of the American people is not there yet,” with single payer.

“So I say to people: if you want it, do it in your states. States are laboratories,” the Dem leader added. “States are a good place to start,” she also said.

Pelosi’s assertions about single payer’s popularity, however, are called into question by public polling.

Last year, Gallup found that 58 percent of the country wants single payer to replace Obamacare, while only 37 percent oppose such a move. Other recent polls, too, have found that either a clear majority or plurality of Americans support single-payer. And polling also has shown that the most vociferous advocate of single payer, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), is the most popular politician in the country, by a wide margin.

Pelosi’s assertion that “states are a good place to start” is also questionable, given recent history. Sanders’ Vermont attempted to create a single payer system after Obamacare passed, but state officials got cold feet and abandoned the plan in 2014.

And though House Democrats’ leader was not even open to considering the idea of single payer on Thursday morning — with America’s healthcare system suddenly back in the limelight — House Republicans were tying their opponents to the initiative.

“Those defending this legislation had a goal,” Rep. Keith Rothfus (R-Pa.) said, referring to Obamacare. “Single payer, socialized medicine.”

The House found itself discussing Republican healthcare plans on Thursday morning, after members of the party caucus agreed to support a revised version of the Obamacare repeal plan that failed to even come up for a vote in March.

The new iteration of the plan passed on Thursday afternoon. It was changed to allow states to opt-out of the Obamacare mandate on preexisting conditions. Republicans are proposing $8 billion for state-run high-risk pools, as a replacement. Critics, like the American Medical Association, said that this would still do “serious harm.”

The March proposal would have cut coverage from some 24 million people, according to Congressional analyses. Republicans are moving their current proposal through the House without waiting for another analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

​​Not everyone can pay for the news. But if you can, we need your support.

Truthout is widely read among people with lower ­incomes and among young people who are mired in debt. Our site is read at public libraries, among people without internet access of their own. People print out our articles and send them to family members in prison — we receive letters from behind bars regularly thanking us for our coverage. Our stories are emailed and shared around communities, sparking grassroots mobilization.

We’re committed to keeping all Truthout articles free and available to the public. But in order to do that, we need those who can afford to contribute to our work to do so — especially now, because we have just 1 day left to raise $25,000 in critical funds.

We’ll never require you to give, but we can ask you from the bottom of our hearts: Will you donate what you can, so we can continue providing journalism in the service of justice and truth?