Skip to content Skip to footer

Ocasio-Cortez Welcomes McConnell’s Call for Rush Vote on Green New Deal

Ocasio-Cortez says McConnell is “banking on people not being courageous.… People should call his bluff.”

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez during a news conference held along with Sen. Ed Markey to unveil their Green New Deal resolution in front of the U.S. Capitol, February 7, 2019, in Washington, D.C.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) appears to believe that he can divide and embarrass the Democratic Party by rushing ahead with a vote on the newly introduced Green New Deal resolution.

But, confident that the calculated ploy will backfire on the GOP, climate groups and progressive lawmakers are telling the Republican leader: “Bring it on.”

After McConnell told reporters on Tuesday that he plans to hold a floor vote the Green New Deal plan unveiled last week by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), environmentalists and progressive members of Congress argued that rather than revealing deep rifts in the Democratic Party, an up-or-down vote will spotlight the GOP’s total opposition to a widely popular policy that represents the best hope of adequately confronting the climate crisis.

“Republicans don’t want to debate climate change, they only want to deny it,” Markey said in a statement after McConnell’s announcement. “They have offered no plan to address this economic and national security threat and want to sabotage any effort that makes Big Oil and corporate polluters pay.”

Since the Green New Deal resolution was introduced last week, President Donald Trump, Republican lawmakers, and right-wing pundits have spread hysterical falsehoods about the measure and decried it as a “socialist fever dream” that would be political suicide for Democrats to support.

But, noting that the Green New Deal is extremely popular among the U.S. public — with one survey showing that 57 percent of Republican voters and 81 percent of Americans overall support the ambitious idea — Markey concluded that “Republicans, climate deniers, and the fossil fuel industry are going to end up on the wrong side of history.”

Ocasio-Cortez — who has led the congressional push to force the Green New Deal into political mainstream — accused McConnell of attempting to “bully” the Democratic Party by plowing ahead with a vote, and argued that Democrats should embrace the opportunity to go on the record in support of bold climate action.

“[H]e’s banking on people not being courageous,” Ocasio-Cortez told the Washington Post. “I think people should call his bluff.”

In response to McConnell’s announcement, the youth-led Sunrise Movement scheduled an “emergency mass call” for Wednesday night to discuss plans to make the Senate Majority Leader regret his politically-motivated scheme.

“This vote forces every member of the Senate to make a choice: will you vote for a plan to guarantee every American clean air and water, a stable climate, and a good job? Or will you stand with Mitch McConnell and the fossil fuel billionaires who are willing to put millions of lives in peril so they can pad their profits?” Sunrise declared.

“In the coming weeks,” the group concluded, “Sunrise Movement’s army of young people will be taking action to expose the moral bankruptcy of GOP elites and invite all Senate Democrats to join Senator Markey in championing the first-ever resolution to rise to the scale and urgency of the climate crisis.”

Ocasio-Cortez and Markey’s Green New Deal resolution — which calls for a “national mobilization” to transition to 100 percent renewable energy by 2030 — has already garnered the support of 67 House Democrats and 11 senators,including major 2020 presidential contenders like Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), and Kamala Harris (D-Calif.).

On top of polls showing the Green New Deal is extremely popular, Nwanevu pointed to another survey showing “that 66 percent of Americans want to see action on climate change, with a 45 percent plurality favoring ‘immediate’ action.”While McConnell seems to think that getting Democrats on the record backing the Green New Deal will help the GOP politically, the New Yorker’s Osita Nwanevu noted that supporting the bold measure “isn’t very fraught with political risk for most Democrats.”

An up-or-down vote on the Green New Deal resolution would also be beneficial for grassroots advocates, Nwanevu argued, because it would also force centrist Democrats who oppose the bold and popular policy to go on the record.

“The resolution will surely be opposed by some Democratic centrists,” he concluded. “This, perhaps counterintuitively, makes an up-or-down vote extraordinarily convenient for activists supporting the Green New Deal — from groups like the Sunrise Movement, Indivisible, and the Sierra Club — who will be able to put pressure on those who reject the resolution in the months ahead. Broadly speaking, a vote on the resolution will do little more for Republicans than further elevate an issue on which they’re deeply at odds with public opinion.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 24 hours to add 200 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.