Skip to content Skip to footer

Obama Was Not on the Ballot

On election night 2009

On election night 2009, the political spin machines were working overtime.
The talking heads were opining on what the results meant for the president’s
standing with the electorate. But the problem is most Americans didn’t
go to the polls, and the ones who did were not given the option of voting for
the president.

In New Jersey, people who voted against incumbent Gov. John Corzine were not
doing it to send a message to Barack Obama. Poll after poll showed that the
state’s high property taxes and John Corzine’s low approval ratings
were driving the race. A vote for John Corzine, the former CEO of Goldman Sachs,
was not a vote for Barack Obama.

Election watchers have been saying that the president’s late campaign efforts
for Corzine show he doesn’t have the grip on the electorate that he had
a year ago. The real question should be why an incumbent governor who was outspending
a relative newcomer 4 to 1 needed Obama to campaign heavily for him in the closing
days of the campaign. Obama wasn’t able to rescue John Corzine, but I’m
willing to bet he would have won New Jersey in a landslide if he was the candidate
on the ballot.

In Virginia, Creigh Deeds ran an old-style campaign where he tried to tear
down his opponent before defining what he was for. That is not the change Americans
voted for last November. Creigh Deeds was the most conservative candidate the
Democrats have nominated for governor in decades, yet he was was painted by
his opponent as being to the left of past nominees. The Republican, Bob McDonnell,
ran a populist campaign focusing on jobs and the economy; the title of McDonnell’s
last campaign ad was “Hope.” Creigh Deeds, not Obama, lost Virginia.

Does anyone think Bob McDonnell could have beaten Barack Obama?

Now we move to the two congressional races. The Democrats won both races, one
of which they have never held before.

Probably the most absurd spin has been talk that the race in the 23rd Congressional
became so heated because of voters’ dissatisfaction with Obama. The special
election in this district is the result of the president choosing Rep. John
M. McHugh to be Secretary of the Army. A Republican has been winning in the
23rd district by large margins since it was created. There is only one other
Republican district in New York. This is the district in which Sara Palin made
headlines by endorsing the third-party candidate Doug Hoffman, leading to a
“civil war” between conservative republicans and party moderates.
The conservatives won and the Republican candidate dropped out of the race and
endorsed the Democrat.

How can anyone make sense of the vote here? It is a solidly Republican district;
the Democrats have never cracked 40 percent of the vote in the district. This
race was a Republican affair, the Democrats were on the sidelines watching Republicans
fight each other. Amazingly on election night the Democrat recieved close to
50 percent of the vote and won.

The pundits want to tell us that the results of two state races and two congressional
districts show a trend. Why not wait until next year when everyone goes to the
polls?

But ultimately, let’s wait until 2012 to see how the country thinks Obama
is doing. That is the next time his name will be on the ballot.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.