With all eyes on Donald Trump’s fixation on the Justice Department Russia probe, the administration looks set to put a fossil fuel industry loyalist at the head of the agency’s environmental protection division.
Jeffrey Clark, a longtime lawyer for energy companies and an environmental prosecutor under the George W. Bush administration, will be considered for the job next week by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
The selection to lead the Environment and Natural Resources Division saw his nomination delayed on Thursday by Democrats on the panel. The lawmakers exercised their right to “holdover” considerations of executive nominees.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) hit out at Clark, noting that the Republican has not ruled out the possibility of presiding over cases that involve a controversial former client: BP.
“For years, Jeffrey Clark defended BP, and has refused to commit to recusing himself from cases involving this constant former client,” Whitehouse said on Thursday.
According to a committee questionnaire, Clark said he would consult with the Justice Department’s ethics office “and will recuse myself from any matter in which it is required.”
The form also noted that Clark has represented BP in litigation arising from the 2010 Deepwater Horizon catastrophe, and that this work “has continued to the present time.”
Clark has also worked for the Chamber of Commerce, which Whitehouse described as a “constant mouthpiece of the fossil fuel industry.” On Tuesday, the House passed legislation, backed by the Chamber, which would weaken Clean Air Act rules on ozone emissions.
Whitehouse also hit out at Clark’s views on pollution, saying the lawyer has questioned climate science, and that “he has repeatedly refused to give a straight answer as to whether he believes [carbon dioxide] emissions are a negative externality of burning fossil fuel.”
“These were softballs,” Whitehouse said. “He completely whiffed.”
On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee was mostly occupied with another nomination. Christopher Wray, Trump’s choice to replace James Comey as head of the FBI, was approved unanimously by the committee.
Democrats decided to waive their right to holdover the Wray nomination, praising him for vowing to operate independently of the White House.
The Democratic senators advanced Wray, despite the fact that many also expressed horror about a Wednesday interview Trump gave to The New York Times.
In the interview, the President said he “would have picked somebody else,” had he known beforehand that Attorney General Jeff Sessions would recuse himself from the Russia investigation.
“We are on the footsteps — or doorstep, I should say — of a Constitutional crisis,” Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said.
“He will not be party to that,” Durbin said, referring to Wray’s confirmation hearing promises to refuse to obstruct justice. “He would rather resign.”
If you like what you’re reading, please support Truthout with a tax-deductible donation.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy