China’s foreign investment into Africa has been generating a great deal of controversy. Some argue that China is becoming the new colonial power over Africa, others see China as a key source of foreign exchange that may finally help spur long-run economic growth in Africa.
There has been relatively less discussion about China’s investment in Latin America, because it was thought that there was so little of it. A closer look reveals that Chinese FDI is larger than previously thought, and growing fast.
According to official Chinese statistics, foreign direct investment (FDI) to Latin America has been relatively limited—averaging just over $4 billion per year between 2003 and 2009. That is 3-4 percent of total FDI into the region over the same period. What is more, according to China, 96.7 percent of all Chinese FDI into Latin America during that period went to the Cayman Islands or the British Virgin Islands—two countries that would sink into the ocean if they had $3 billion per year in such investment. Peal away these two financial havens and the Latin American region only received about $126 million in Chinese FDI, or less than 1 percent of the annual total.
Nothing worth investigating—if it wasn’t for the increasing concern or fanfare about Chinese FDI from Latin Americans. In response to cheer and outcry, think-tanks, venture capital firms, journalists, and academics like myself have been trying to piece together how much Chinese FDI really does flow to the region. The table below from a forthcoming paper I am working on exhibits just some of the largest projects in Latin America (those over $100 million) to reveal that FDI from China to Latin America is indeed approximately closer to the figures for total FDI into the region reported by China, at around $4 billion per year, but the composition of that investment is far from simply in tax havens.
Click the image to enlarge.
As the accompanying table exhibits, China is largely pursuing investment in primary products such as iron, copper, and soybeans. Indeed, in my forthcoming book with Roberto Porzecanski titled The Dragon in the Room: China and the Future of Latin American Industrialization, we calculate that Latin America accounts for more than one quarter of all China’s imports of primary products, more than any single region. It should thus come as no surprise that the main determinant of Chinese FDI into the region is the fact that Latin America has location-specific assets—natural resources.
Busy schedule? Click here to keep up with Truthout with free email updates.
In addition to being “resource seeking,” albeit to a lesser extent, Chinese FDI into the region is also “market-seeking” and “efficiency seeking.” Chinese steel makers and auto companies such as Chery Auto have invested in Brazil in order to serve Brazil’s large market. Chinese auto firms and electronics have also located in Uruguay and Mexico to seek “efficiency”—or to serve as export platforms to larger markets, namely Brazil (Uruguay) and the United States (Mexico).
Latin America is in desperate need of investment. Total investment as a percent of GDP for the region is less than 20 percent per annum, much less than the suggested 25 percent by the Growth Commission and levels over 35 percent across East Asia. It is also established that the FDI that LAC has received over the past twenty-years has had a very limited impact in the region.
I co-chaired a multi-year effort where numerous economists from across Latin America examined the economic, social, and environmental impacts of foreign investment. We summarized our findings in a 2009 book titled Re-thinking Foreign Investment for Sustainable Development: Lessons from Latin America. As we found in our book, developed country FDI tends not to contribute to economic growth, employment, or innovation, and often is no more apt to comply to environmental standards than domestic firms are.
Will Chinese FDI behave differently than FDI largely of Western origin? It is too early to tell whether Chinese FDI into Latin America will be a blessing or curse. For now at least we are beginning to understand the magnitude and true composition of China’s economic reach in Latin America.
Kevin P. Gallagher is an Associate Professor of International Relations at Boston University, and a Senior Researcher at the Global Development and Environment Institute.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.