Elon Musk, the world’s richest person and the largest donor to President Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign, has poured millions of dollars into Wisconsin’s upcoming Supreme Court race — the latest example of the tech billionaire exerting political power to preserve his own business interests.
Musk is by far the largest single donor in Wisconsin’s current judicial election cycle. The April 1 election will likely play a major role in the future makeup of Congress — and tipping the balance of the court could also result in justices lifting state regulations that affect Musk’s car company, Tesla.
As it currently stands, Wisconsin’s Supreme Court has a slight liberal majority, with four liberal justices and three conservative justices. A liberal justice is ending her current term without seeking reelection, which means that, if conservative Judge Brad Schimel wins over liberal Judge Susan Crawford, the conservative bloc will become the majority.
During a live discussion on his social media site X, Musk told U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) why he has invested $19 million in the race.
“This is a very important race for many reasons. The most consequential is that [it] will decide how congressional districts are drawn in Wisconsin, which if the other candidate wins, instead of Justice [sic] Schimel, then the Democrats will attempt to redraw the districts and cause Wisconsin to lose two Republican seats,” Musk said.
He further described the race as “a big deal given that the congressional majority is so razor-thin.”
Democrats have acknowledged that the race could help their party on the national stage, as Republicans have long benefited from gerrymandered districts, which last year resulted in a 6-2 majority over Democrats in the state congressional delegation. The Princeton Gerrymandering Project has demonstrated that the district maps are drawn in Republicans’ favor, rating them an “F” in terms of partisan fairness.
After the Wisconsin Supreme Court shifted to a liberal balance a few years ago, it heard cases challenging political maps. While the court eventually ruled in favor of a redraw of state legislative boundaries, it refused to hear a case dealing with the congressional districts, as a newly appointed liberal justice abstained from deciding on the issue due to not being in office when it was first brought up.
Conservative bloc justices on the court said it “likely won’t be long” before there is another challenge to congressional maps.
Wisconsin is a “purple” state, meaning its statewide races are often very close. In the last three presidential races, for example, the elections were decided by 1 percent margins or smaller, with Trump winning in 2024 and 2016 and former President Joe Biden winning in 2020. But in the state legislature, Republicans, benefiting from gerrymandered maps the party drew in 2011 and beyond, had nearly a two-thirds majority. After the state Supreme Court ordered districts to be redrawn, the split in the state legislature became more aligned with the electorate’s purple status, with the GOP having a majority of +9 seats in the state Assembly after the 2024 election rather than their previous margin of +29 seats two years prior.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court could indeed rule on gerrymandering in its next term. It also has the potential to shift the state’s standards on reproductive rights and abortion access, union and workers’ rights, and voting rights — as well as regulatory standards relating to the sale of Tesla vehicles in the state.
Current Wisconsin law forbids car manufacturers from also being able to own dealerships. Tesla, which is owned by Musk, failed to receive a regulatory pass regarding that standard, and the company is currently suing the state over the law, which it says is unconstitutional. The case will undoubtedly make its way to the state Supreme Court.
If Schimel wins the race over Crawford, he would not have to recuse himself from that case, even after benefiting from millions of dollars in indirect donations from Musk. That’s because, under Wisconsin’s judicial code, justices decide for themselves whether they should recuse from cases based on conflicts of interest.
During the recent event with Musk, Johnson, Wisconsin’s senior U.S. senator, recognized how the billionaire’s $19 million in donations to various political action committees and the state Republican Party has helped Schimel. Much of that money was used to fund a smear campaign that has included false or misleading ads against Crawford.
“If we do win [the state Supreme Court election], we have to thank Elon for all the support he’s given this race,” Johnson said this week.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.