Skip to content Skip to footer

Mitch McConnell Dismisses Representation for DC and Puerto Rico as “Socialism”

For decades the Republican Party has supported possible statehood, but Trump is now against it.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is seen during a news conference in the Capitol on June 18, 2019, in Washington, D.C.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell argued in a Fox News interview that giving congressional representation to the millions of Americans who live in Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico would be “full-bore socialism.”

The senator from Kentucky, which ranks third in state tax dependency, said in an interview with Fox News host Laura Ingraham that Democrats are trying to “turn us into a country we’ve never been.”

“They plan to make the District of Columbia a state — that’d give them two new Democratic senators — Puerto Rico a state, that would give them two more new Democratic senators,” McConnell complained. “And as a former Supreme Court clerk yourself, you’ve surely noticed that they plan to expand the Supreme Court. So this is full-bore socialism on the march in the House. And yeah, as long as I’m the majority leader of the Senate, none of that stuff is going anywhere.”

Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia are home to nearly 4 million Americans who have no voting representation in Congress, despite a combined population that rivals the state of Kentucky. Puerto Rico alone has a larger population than 21 states.

While citizens of those jurisdictions pay federal taxes without any federal representation, Kentucky takes $2.61 from federal taxpayers for every dollar its residents pay in taxes. The Bluegrass State’s tax dependency ranks only behind Mississippi and New Mexico, according to a WalletHub study.

McConnell’s statement also contradicts his own party’s platform. The GOP’s official position for years has been to “support the right of the United States citizens of Puerto Rico to be admitted to the Union as a fully sovereign state.”

Just last month, Puerto Rico Resident Commissioner Jenniffer González-Colón and Rep. Don Young of Alaska, both Republicans, backed a bill supported by Puerto Rico Gov. Ricardo Rosselló, a Democrat, that would admit the island into the union within 90 days of passage.

Rep. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., who chairs the Natural Resources Insular and Alaska Native Affairs Subcommittee, which oversees U.S. territories, said last month the bill was needed because Puerto Ricans have even fewer rights than American citizens living abroad, since they are not allowed to vote for president.

“We in this country have said ‘separate but equal’ is inherently unequal. And yet, we allow this to happen to 3.2 million people every day, that their rights are determined by their zip code or by their area code,” Gallego told The Hill. “A Puerto Rican can jump on a plane and land in Florida and have 100 percent equal rights, or stay on the island and have diminished rights. In what world can we allow that to happen?”

Even Trump backed Puerto Rico statehood back during the 2016 campaign and the official Republican Party platform at his nominating convention stated that “the will of the Puerto Rican people in any status referendum should be considered as Congress follows through on any desired change in status for Puerto Rico, including statehood.”

Trump has since changed his mind on the topic amid his beefs with the island’s officials. In 2018, Trump said he was an “absolute no” on Puerto Rico statehood.

“With the mayor of San Juan as bad as she is and as incompetent as she is, Puerto Rico shouldn’t be talking about statehood until they get some people that really know what they’re doing,” he said.

So when McConnell calls the Puerto Rico statehood — a concept long supported by his own party — a symptom of “socialism,” he appears to mean that the president does not like it anymore.

“The laziness isn’t helping anyone. For one thing, if giving Americans a voice in the U.S. Senate is ‘socialism,’ McConnell is necessarily going to make socialism more popular,” wrote MSNBC’s Steve Benen. “For another, if Democrats or others on the left start pushing ideas that might actually deserve the ‘socialist’ label, the word will have been stripped of any potency through constant dilution. … Giving Americans representation in Congress is not part of a subtle campaign to empower the federal government to control the means of production.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.