A school district in southwestern Missouri is bringing back corporal punishment as a disciplinary measure, in the form of spanking with a paddle.
Cassville Public Schools announced the option for parents to “opt into” having their children be punished by being “swatted on the buttocks with a paddle,” according to reporting from The Kansas City Star. Under the new policy, students can be hit by a school administrator with a paddle to avoid suspension, with the permission of a parent or guardian.
The district’s decision to allow the archaic form of punishment in schools has divided the community.
“I do not think it is appropriate…At the end of the day, they are having to hold the child down and spank them or use whatever means that they can to make the child submissive when that is not the issue, it is the fact that they need to be heard because children act out for varied reasons,” said Miranda Waltrip, a parent of three children who attend the district.
Superintendent Merlyn Johnson has claimed that most of the district’s residents back the change, citing feedback he’s personally received from community members in support of the disciplinary measure.
“This was just another option that we could use before we get to that point of suspension,” he said.
There are a number of nonviolent alternatives to suspensions that the district could have chosen to adopt, however. One effective and meaningful disciplinary measure is restorative chat, which helps students “understand the harm done by their actions and [allows] them an opportunity to repair this harm” in an empowering and non-humiliating way, according to a 2017 article from the National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Corporal punishment, specifically spanking, has long been known to be an ineffective means of disciplining children; in fact, such measures can actually increase the very behaviors that disciplinarians are trying to correct.
“Many studies have shown that physical punishment — including spanking, hitting and other means of causing pain — can lead to increased aggression, antisocial behavior, physical injury and mental health problems for children,” writer Brendan L. Smith noted in an article for the American Psychological Association’s Monitor on Psychology in 2012.
More recent studies have also found that corporal punishment can result in long-term negative effects for children that often last into adulthood.
“We know that spanking is not effective and can be harmful for children’s development and increases the chance of mental health issues,” said Jorge Cuartas, who co-authored a Harvard study on the issue that was published in 2021. “We also know it can have potential impact on brain development, changing biology, and leading to lasting consequences.”
A 2016 study published in the Society for Research in Child Development found that, in states where corporal punishment is still used in schools, Black children, boys and children with disabilities were disproportionately targeted.
The district’s return to corporal punishment comes as right-wing lawmakers are launching a barrage of attacks on students’ autonomy across the country, often under the banner of preserving parental rights. In recent months, far right lawmakers have banned books from school libraries, specifically those that include Black and LGBTQ perspectives; attempted to force teachers to “out” trans students to their parents; and imposed Christianity upon students in public school settings where religious actions are not supposed to be promoted by faculty, among other actions.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.