Skip to content Skip to footer

Michael Isikoff, et al. | Contempt for Karzai

Last fall President Obama made what may be his most agonizing decision yet, sending 30,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan. But now White House officials are making little secret about how exasperated they are with the erratic behavior of the country’s president, Hamid Karzai.

Truthout’s December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we will be able to do in 2026. Please support us with a tax-deductible donation today.

Last fall President Obama made what may be his most agonizing decision yet, sending 30,000 more U.S. troops to Afghanistan. But now White House officials are making little secret about how exasperated they are with the erratic behavior of the country’s president, Hamid Karzai.

After Karzai suggested last week that he might join the Taliban if the U.S. and other Western nations keep dictating how his government should be run, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters that the president may scrap a planned meeting between the two leaders next month. One big issue lurking behind the spat: an ever more tense confrontation regarding alleged corruption within Karzai’s inner circle.

With American backing, a special anti-corruption unit of the Afghan attorney general’s office has been developing cases against as many as 17 senior Afghan political figures, many of them with close ties to Karzai. One, the former mining minister, is under investigation for allegedly receiving about $10 million in kickbacks from a Chinese company that was awarded a copper concession. (The minister says he’s not guilty.) But the unit’s first big test case involves Mohammad Siddiq Chakari, the ex-minister of the hajj and religious affairs. Karzai appointed him to the post last year as part of a deal to get support for reelection from key political figures, including Burhanuddin Rabbani, the former leader of the Northern Alliance, who also happens to be Chakari’s father-in-law. Another former top Alliance official was Chakari’s business partner.

Last fall two of Chakari’s underlings were arrested at Kabul airport trying to smuggle $360,000 much of it stuffed in packages of sweets and cookies through customs. Afghan anti-corruption investigators have since developed a case alleging that Chakari was getting kickbacks from travel-services companies in Dubai, inflating what it cost for Afghans to make their holy voyages to Mecca. “He was ripping off hajj pilgrims,” says one Western official familiar with the case, who asked not be identified talking about the ongoing probe. (Chakari has said that he is “100 percent innocent” of the allegations.)

The anti-corruption unit repeatedly sought an arrest warrant for Chakari, but Karzai and his attorney general balked. At first, officials in the A.G.’s office refused to sign a warrant. Then they signed one that was improperly worded. In the meantime, Chakari left for the United Kingdom. After repeated U.S. complaints, Afghan officials said last week that they would seek an Interpol arrest warrant for the wayward minister. A Karzai spokesman denied that the president was interfering in the case. But U.S. and Afghan officials are more and more skeptical that Karzai will ever move aggressively against allegedly corrupt associates. “Karzai knows about all these people and their corruption,” a senior Afghan official, who didn’t want to be named talking about the president, tells Newsweek. “But he’s afraid if he goes after the corrupt, he would lose his allies.”

(c) 2010, Newsweek Inc. All rights reserved.

Our most important fundraising appeal of the year

December is the most critical time of year for Truthout, because our nonprofit news is funded almost entirely by individual donations from readers like you. So before you navigate away, we ask that you take just a second to support Truthout with a tax-deductible donation.

This year is a little different. We are up against a far-reaching, wide-scale attack on press freedom coming from the Trump administration. 2025 was a year of frightening censorship, news industry corporate consolidation, and worsening financial conditions for progressive nonprofits across the board.

We can only resist Trump’s agenda by cultivating a strong base of support. The right-wing mediasphere is funded comfortably by billionaire owners and venture capitalist philanthropists. At Truthout, we have you.

We’ve set an ambitious target for our year-end campaign — a goal of $180,000 to keep up our fight against authoritarianism in 2026. Please take a meaningful action in this fight: make a one-time or monthly donation to Truthout before December 31. If you have the means, please dig deep.