EU heads of state gathering today and tomorrow will discuss the European Energy Security Strategy promoting a number of massive infrastructure projects which include gas pipelines, LNG terminals and storage facilities even though their overall environmental impact has not been adequately assessed. Environmentalists are currently battling the European Commission over this issue in Court.
The European Council is expected to give its green light to the European Commission for further work on defining the key security of supply infrastructure projects. However, a mandatory Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is lacking for the entire PCI list [1]. The list consists of 248 different projects across Europe where the key security of supply projects have been selected from.
The decision of the EU Council will have far-reaching consequences as those projects and thus their promoters will benefit from preferential access to the EU backed sources of financing such as loans from the European Investment Bank and EU grants of the Connecting Europe Facility.
Additionally, as of the 1st of July the Commission encourages member states to provide state aid to these projects [2]. This would allow non-economical projects to benefit from national level state aid to cover up to 100% of the funding gap, next to EUR 5.85 billion already allocated from the EU budget.
Earlier this year the NGO Justice and Environment has taken the European Commission to court for not properly involving civil society in the selection process of priority energy projects and not assessing their full impact on environment [3]. The case is still ongoing.
“EU governments should request a more thorough analysis from the Commission – including a proper stakeholder dialogue – of the environmental and climate impacts of the energy infrastructure before they decide on granting them a special status”, commented Birgit Schmidhuber from Justice and Environment.
One of the projects that could profit from a Council decision is Trans-Adriatic Gas Pipeline (TAP) bringing Azeri Gas to Italy. “The result will be that communities who live along the track of the pipeline are totally excluded from the process while they will be the first victims of the environmental impact of this project”, says Elena Gerebizza from Re:Common in Italy.
Counter Balance and CEE Bankwatch Network have been warning about the danger of overreliance on gas in shaping the EU’s energy future [4]. “More gas infrastructure is not only unnecessary according to the European Commission’s own projection but also undermines decarbonisation objectives we cannot sacrifice on the altar of free market theory [5],” says Kuba Gogolewski from CEE Bankwatch Network.
Notes:
[1] https://www.unece.org/env/eia/about/sea_text.html
[2] https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-673_en.htm
[3]https://www.justiceandenvironment.org/_files/file/2014/Press%20Release%201%20of%202014%20PCI%20court%20case_final.pdf
[4] https://www.counter-balance.org/no-more-gas/
[5] https://www.counter-balance.org/new-mega-gas-pipelines-redundant-according-to-the-eus-own-projections/
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.