The latest United Nations report on the threat of global warming – by far the most serious warning ever of possible environmental disaster – raises a string of serious challenges to overcome during the next 13 months if the world’s nations are to sign a new, binding climate pact at the end of 2015.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) hard-nosed report, released in Copenhagen on November 2, describes in detail the disaster ahead unless humankind can perform a near miracle by reversing carbon emissions by 2020 and then phasing out emissions entirely by the end of this century.
The document was finalized following a week of sometimes acrimonious discussion between scientists and officials from countries such as the United States and Canada with large fossil fuel reserves which were only slightly successful in having some of the report’s tough language removed.
The report was prepared to provide up-to-date information for governments attempting to deliver a new global treaty on climate change during a final UN Climate Summit scheduled for Paris in December 2015.
The IPCC offers hope for the future of the planet by saying that if the right solutions are put into place, there can be continued economic and human development.
Several Difficulties to Overcome
However, considering the severity of the report and its political implications, it is questionable how much progress can be made because of a number of difficulties that must be overcome.
To begin with, the UN lacks the power to force governments to follow any particular course of action. While UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon sounds like he is in charge of a solid campaign for change, he’s really a concerned cheerleader. Moreover, the November 2 report includes only vague suggestions concerning actions that should be taken to slow global warming. It says that:
- Most of the world’s electricity should be produced from low-carbon sources by 2050;
- Renewables will have to grow from the current 30 percent share to 80 percent of the power sector by 2050;
- Fossil fuel power generation without carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology would need to be phased out almost entirely by 2100. However, the world has only one CCS plant in operation as the technology has not proven to be reliable; and
- Perhaps in keeping with the desperate situation facing the UN, it meekly offers that behavioral changes, such as eating less meat, can have a role in cutting emissions.
One ongoing political issue concerns to what extent wealthy countries, which are responsible for much of the climate destruction to this point, are willing to assist less developed nations in covering the costs of mitigating the damage caused by climate change.
Little Funding for South Projects
An important step was taken in late October when the UN finalized the formation of the Green Climate Fund (GCF), which is receiving pledges of funds that will be used to launch climate projects in developing countries. The target set at the 2009 Copenhagen Summit was to raise $100 billion by 2020. However, pledges have been slow to come in, so the UN now hopes governments and the private sector will commit $15 billion as starter capital.
The UN is keeping a close eye on somewhat acrimonious discussions underway between the United States and China over reducing the burning of coal, which is the world’s dirtiest polluter. If the two superpowers cannot reach an agreement, some countries may be reluctant to sign onto a binding deal in 2015.
Another issue concerning the United States is whether President Obama, who no doubt would like to boost his legacy with a global climate agreement, will have the power to sign an agreement in Paris. In September, members of the Senate, many of whom receive large donations from carbon-producing corporations, refused to sign the United States onto a special declaration. It called for the establishment of a global price on carbon that would penalize industries for excessive carbon emissions.
Obama almost certainly will need the backing of the Senate if he is to sign the United States on to a full agreement next year.
Lurking in the background are powerful corporations that would lose trillions of dollars and be forced to rethink their future if the drastic measures called for by the IPCC are implemented.
Fear Corporations Will Dominate Talks
The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO), which monitors corporate power in Europe, claims that “dirty energy corporations” will try to hijack the next round of UN climate negotiations, scheduled for December in Peru. “Some of the most polluting corporations and their lobby groups are trying to prevent governments from endorsing effective climate action and instead promoting false solutions like dirty coal and carbon markets,” CEO said.
In fact, corporate participation in the climate discussions is coordinated by the UN Global Compact, a powerful business lobby that looks out for the interests of corporations across a number of UN program areas. Many of the corporations come from the energy sector.
Despite the obstacles ahead, a group of leading nongovernmental organizations optimistically issued a report in September outlining what they believe needs to come out of the Paris summit.
The NGO report says that, among other things, a new agreement needs to include: a clear signal to businesses to steer investment toward low-carbon outcomes; ambitious action before and after 2020; a strong legal framework with clear rules for compliance; a central role for equity among countries; considerable public finance for adaptation and a framework for action on deforestation and land use.
The next round of discussions will be held in Lima, Peru, from December 1 to 12.
Not everyone can pay for the news. But if you can, we need your support.
Truthout is widely read among people with lower incomes and among young people who are mired in debt. Our site is read at public libraries, among people without internet access of their own. People print out our articles and send them to family members in prison — we receive letters from behind bars regularly thanking us for our coverage. Our stories are emailed and shared around communities, sparking grassroots mobilization.
We’re committed to keeping all Truthout articles free and available to the public. But in order to do that, we need those who can afford to contribute to our work to do so.
We’ll never require you to give, but we can ask you from the bottom of our hearts: Will you donate what you can, so we can continue providing journalism in the service of justice and truth?