Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, the right-wing Democrat-turned-independent who is set to retire from the Senate upon the expiration of his term early next year, has announced that he will not endorse Democratic nominee for president Kamala Harris, citing her support for ending the filibuster in order to protect and expand reproductive rights.
The filibuster — a Senate rule that is mentioned exactly zero times within the U.S. Constitution — has been a roadblock for a number of bills over the past decade, including legislation to protect in vitro fertilization, re-establish federal abortion protections, expand voting rights and enact gun reforms, among other items. Even if a proposal is able to receive majority endorsement in the Senate, the filibuster requires a supermajority of 60 votes within the 100-member chamber of Congress for a bill to be passed.
In an interview on Tuesday with Wisconsin Public Radio, Harris said she would support ending the filibuster in order to pass legislation to codify abortion protections that were established in Roe v. Wade, a 1973 Supreme Court decision that the right-wing Court overturned in 2022.
“I think we should eliminate the filibuster for Roe … to actually put back in law the protections for reproductive freedom, and for the ability of every person and every woman to make decisions about their own body and not have their government tell them what to do,” Harris said in the interview.
Harris’s recent comments are consistent with what she’s said in the past. In 2022, for example, she backed ending the filibuster to protect reproductive rights, and in 2019 she said she would support ending the archaic and pointless Senate rule to pass the Green New Deal.
In response to Harris’s latest comments, however, Manchin incredulously attacked Harris for daring to suggest that the rule should be ended.
“Shame on her,” Manchin said, wrongly describing the filibuster as “the Holy Grail of democracy.”
“It’s the only thing that keeps us talking and working together. If she gets rid of that, then this would be the House on steroids,” Manchin added.
In actuality, the filibuster has often been used to block pro-democracy reforms, including the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, which a majority of Americans support. The filibuster was also used multiple times during the Civil Rights Movement as a means to block basic freedoms for nonwhite Americans, and has been used to stifle political rights for women.
Regardless, Manchin said he wouldn’t endorse Harris in her election bid against Trump. “That ain’t going to happen,” he said, adding that, in his opinion, ending the filibuster could “destroy our country” and would be “the most horrible thing.”
When Manchin was reminded that Harris has been against the filibuster for at least the past five years, he shrugged it off, saying he was “hoping she would change this.”
Notably, most democracies around the world do not have a filibuster within the upper chamber of their national legislature, and while supermajorities are generally needed for constitutional changes, no other industrial democracies apply the filibuster to all legislation the way the U.S. Senate does. What’s more, only 13 U.S. states have the filibuster within their legislative rules, further disproving the West Virginia senator’s claims that “democracy” requires the mechanism.
Political observers were quick to criticize Manchin for his comments.
“Defending ‘the filibuster’ over women’s bodily autonomy is one heck of a way for Joe Manchin to leave the scene,” said Democratic political strategist Tom Bonier. “Though I imagine this lack of endorsement helps Harris much more than it hurts her.”
“Joe Manchin thinks the filibuster is the ‘Holy Grail of democracy?’ A rule that was used to thwart democracy by blocking voting rights for Black people is the Holy Grail of democracy? Please tell me that’s a joke,” political commentator Keith Boykin opined.
Charlotte Clymer, an LGBTQ activist and political observer, also weighed in on Manchin’s statements, saying:
My thoughts on the Senate filibuster are simple: it is an historically racist procedural move that was popularized to preserve white supremacy and has long sabotaged the most essential function of our government: serving the people. Kill it, burn it, and flush the ashes.
Polling shows that most Americans agree with Clymer’s views. A Navigator Research poll from March, for example, shows that nearly three-quarters of Americans believe ending the filibuster would help fix America in some way. Only 27 percent of respondents said it wouldn’t help the country.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 130 new monthly donors before midnight tonight.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy