According to several US prosecutors, evidence reveals that the four Blackwater guards, who are facing charges of manslaughter and gun violations in the horrific Sept. 16, 2007, shootings in Baghdad, Iraq, were motivated by deep hostility and hatred towards the Iraqi civilian population in general. If this is the case, then in America not only has killing been made technologically easy and socially entertaining, but it has also become ever-so internalized and essential.(1)
After World I and II, US military and political officials became increasingly alarmed when it was discovered that very few infantry personnel had actually fired their weapons. In order to combat these low firing rates, new techniques were designed to instill higher firing rates. By replacing small, circular paper targets with human-like, silhouette figures on the firing range, firing rates rose. Advanced weaponry that killed from a distance, and a barrage of propaganda aimed at dehumanizing the opponent, increased kill rates too.
The American Psychiatric and American Medical associations’ observations that violence in the US media greatly increased aggression did not go unnoticed. Working with the movie and gaming industries, military officials initiated pro-war and violent shows, films, video games, and music to encourage violent attitudes, behaviors, and values, mainly in children. Measurable long-term effects prove that associating violence with entertainment leads to emotional desensitization toward violence and killing in real life. (2)
Has killing now been made essential, meaning obligatory and necessary? With regards to the upcoming trial of the private contractor Blackwater security guards, the answer is yes. Evidence suggests the guards that killed 14 Iraqi civilians while wounding 18 others did not believe they were under hostile fire but had harbored a low regard for, and deep hostility toward the entire Iraqi civilian population. Furthermore, they had openly expressed a sense of euphoria to other Blackwater personnel about killing Iraqis. (3)
According to the prosecution’s court filing, one Blackwater guard even admitted he wanted to kill as many Iraqis as he could as “payback for 9-11,” and repeatedly boasted about the number of Iraqis he had shot, including an old Iraqi woman. Other guards, still in the Army, deliberately fired their weapons to instigate battles or to draw out return fire so a battle could ensue. Automatic weapons were carelessly fired at civilians from the turrets of armored vehicles without regard for who might be struck by the rounds.
Military professionalism has not only collapsed, but so too has American society. The trail leads from ordinary citizen-soldiers to the revolving doors between the Pentagon and privatized corporations, even the president. Armed gangs and thugs within the military, along with drug use and violence addictions are not the only problems Americans should be concerned about. Then-President George W. Bush’s political mandate, that he claimed to have won in 2004, was an unspoken mandate to essentially kill more innocent Iraqis.
With the military-industrial-entertainment-complex’s dehumanization of Iraqis in general, killing became obligatory and necessary. Unequal and remote weaponry and wars fought from a distance, violence in entertainment and every-day life, and connecting 9-11 with Iraq through a series of lies and propaganda, made killing painless, amusing and leisurely. Therefore, who and what should really be on trial?
(1) www.csmonitor.com. Blackwater shootings: Why Did they shoot Iraqi civilians in 2007?/3/20/2014.
(2) Grossman, Dave, Lt. Col., On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning To Kill in War and Society., New York, New York: Back Bay Books, 2009., XX.
(3) www.csmonitor.com. Blackwater shootings: Why Did they shoot Iraqi civilians in 2007?
(4) Grossman, Dave, Lt. Col., On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning To Kill in War and Society., p. 99.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We’re presently working to find 1500 new monthly donors to Truthout before the end of the year.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy