Phnom Penh, Cambodia – In the first verdict at the UN-backed war crimes tribunal, the Khmer Rouge’s chief executioner has been found guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Kaing Guek Eav, better known by his nom de guerre, “Duch,” ran the notorious S-21 prison where as many as 17,000 people were tortured before being killed.
“Every individual detained within S-21 was destined for execution in accordance with the Communist Party of Kampuchea policy to ‘smash’ all enemies,” according to a summary of the judgment read to the courtroom by Nil Nonn, the tribunal’s president.
The judgment also noted that “at least 100 S-21 detainees died after being bled to death by the S-21 Medical Unit.”
In all, the Khmer Rouge regime is blamed for the deaths of as many as 2 million people during its rule from 1975-1979. Many were worked to death or died from starvation, disease, or execution.
Duch received a 35-year sentence for his role in Khmer Rouge killings, but judges reduced it to 19 years in lieu of time served since 1999, when he was discovered living under a pseudonym in the Cambodian countryside and imprisoned. Cambodia has no death penalty.
This means the spritely 67-year old could be freed at the age of 86.
Shock Over Shortened Sentence
The verdict shocked some Cambodians who think Duch should spend the rest of his life in prison. Outside the courtroom, some expressed anger with the judges’ decision.
“Anything less than 30 years is just not acceptable, it’s just not acceptable. The judges would be making light of the crimes, the atrocities of that era, of what he committed,” says Theary Seng, whose family members were murdered by the regime. “He should be receiving many life sentences, even considering the mitigating factors, because of the lives that he took.”
When considering their verdict, judges said they took into account mitigating factors including Duch’s expressions of remorse, his admission of guilt, and his cooperation with the court.
Lawyers for the prosecution, who had asked for a 45-year sentence, said they were satisfied with the court’s decision.
“It certainly provides a penalty I think the Cambodian people will appreciate,” said prosecutor William Smith. But he added that the prosecution would consider appealing for a stiffer sentence.
A Triumph for International Justice?
Duch’s defense lawyer did not speak to journalists, but he has 30 days to appeal the sentence. Some observers say that Duch will appeal, noting that he asked for acquittal at the end of his trial, arguing that he was not one of the highest-ranking Khmer Rouge officials.
“I think it is likely that we will have an appeal,” says Heather Ryan of the Open Society Justice Institute, which monitors the tribunal. “I would have a hard time seeing that on appeal he could get a shorter sentence.”
She added that the verdict proves to Cambodians that leaders cannot commit atrocities with impunity. “All in all,” she says, “I feel satisfied and sort of inspired.”
But Ms. Seng says the thought of Duch walking free in 19 years could lead Cambodians to lose faith in international justice. The United Nations-backed court overcame more than a decade of heated negotiations, delays, and wrangling to reach its first verdict, yet it is still struggling to overcome cash-shortages and allegations of corruption and political interference.
“This is the worst legacy to be left by this process – to have a society that is already cynical, that is very distrusting, to have that society further embedded in cynicism,” says Seng. “And this verdict leaves that possibility.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.