The inspector general’s office within the Department of Justice (DOJ) is opening an investigation into whether officials in that department tried to use the powers delegated to them through their employment to attempt to help former President Donald Trump overturn the results of the 2020 presidential race.
DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz announced the launch of the inquiry, which would be limited solely to investigating officials in that department, on Monday. Horowitz stated that the inquiry was being opened in order to reassure the public that recent events, related to reports of a scheme by a former DOJ official to overturn election results in Georgia, are being looked into.
“The inspector general is initiating an investigation into whether any former or current DOJ official engaged in an improper attempt to have DOJ seek to alter the outcome of the 2020 presidential election,” a statement from Horowitz said.
The announcement from Horowitz comes days after reporting from The New York Times indicated that a DOJ lawyer and Trump loyalist named Jeffrey Clark had approached the former president with a plan that would allow them to overturn Georgia’s presidential results in Trump’s favor. President Joe Biden defeated Trump in Georgia, becoming the first Democratic presidential candidate since 1992 to win that state.
Clark, who was sympathetic to the former president’s false claims of election fraud, suggested to Trump that he should fire then-acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen, replacing him with Clark instead who would then take the necessary steps toward responding to Trump’s claims that Georgia’s presidential election outcome was stolen from him.
Clark had met with Trump earlier this month to discuss his plan for overturning the election and had told Rosen about it shortly after that meeting, prompting Rosen to then demand a meeting with Trump to find out how serious the former president was about the plan. In addition to Trump, that meeting was attended by Clark, Rosen, White House counsel Pat Cipollone, and another unnamed senior Justice Department official, sources speaking to The Times said.
At the meeting, both Clark and Rosen reportedly tried to convince Trump to adopt their views on what course of action should be taken. But before Trump could make a decision, word got around that several officials at the DOJ had said that they would resign in protest if the former president sought to carry out Clark’s plan.
Upon weighing the public relations impact of mass protest resignations at the DOJ, Trump is reported to have backed off from consideration of Clark’s vision, conceding that it probably would not work in his favor.
Following publication of The Times’s report, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) blasted Clark’s alleged scheme, and called for an inquiry into the matter.
“Unconscionable [that] a Trump Justice Department leader would conspire to subvert the people’s will,” Schumer wrote in a tweet on Saturday. “The Justice Dept Inspector General must launch an investigation into this attempted sedition now.”
Trump has pushed a number of baseless and unfounded claims of election fraud, in Georgia and elsewhere, since he lost the presidential election to Biden in November. Yet, in spite of having an attorney general who was loyal to him, the DOJ would not open an inquiry into his assertions of fraud.
In mid-December, then-Attorney General William Barr, who was days away from resigning his post, said he saw no basis to seize voting machines or otherwise issue orders to investigate claims of fraud in Georgia.
“If I thought a special counsel at this stage was the right tool and was appropriate, I would name one, but I haven’t, and I’m not going to,” Barr, who was one of Trump’s most ardent loyalists in the executive branch, said at the time.
In addition to an inquiry into current and former DOJ officials and their possible attempts to overturn the election on his behalf, Trump himself is facing an impeachment trial in the Senate, set to commence next month. Although he cannot be removed from the presidency, as he is already out of office, the trial could result in his being barred from being able to hold federal office ever again.
Trump’s impeachment in the House of Representatives this month came about after a majority vote in that legislative body determined he had incited a mob of his loyalists to attack the Capitol building on January 6 during a rally outside the White House earlier in the day. Five individuals died as a result of the breach of the Capitol that day.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy