That the Democratic Party will lose seats in the Senate and the House is now received wisdom across the political spectrum. Forget received. It’s been filed, stamped, indexed and displayed.
According to two key observers, Charlie Cook and 538.com’s Nate Silver, “Democrats are in hot water, according to political analysts quoted in Monday’s Politico. Democrats are poised to lose ‘double-digit’ seats in the House amid an increasingly bitter political climate.”
Oh, no! Nate Silver is never wrong!
Matt Yglesias sees blood in the tea leaves too: “Because the whole House turns over every two years, to merely sustain a large Democratic majority requires an overwhelmingly favorable political climate. Since Democrats clearly don’t have such a climate, they’re facing massive losses.”
So, why is the sky falling? The poor economy and high unemployment numbers are the most cited factors. The first election after a new president takes office is also traditionally a bad time for that president’s party.
The above article cited a more arcane factor. It says the normal state of Congress is a slight Republican advantage because of the way districts are drawn up. So, the stars have to be heavily in alignment for the Democrats to keep such a large edge.
All these theories assume the electorate is a vast unthinking blob. “Oh the economy sucks so it’s the president’s or the current Congress’ fault. History started this year.” Or even better “I voted for the president last year and now I’m sick of him and his party so now I’ll vote for the other guys.” I don’t remember things happening quite this way in 2002. There was a recession and a newly elected Republican president and the Republicans cleaned up in the midterm elections.
Now, you might think that the economy was a mess when Democrats got full control, and they could certainly have done more, but they’ve taken some steps – the cash for clunkers program, the stimulus bill. Does anyone other than the most deranged Tea Partiers believe the Republicans would have done more to correct the situation? If you get all your news from Fox (or even CNN!) you might have some pretty misguided notions of why the economy is the way it is now. But if you’re anyone else and the Democrats manage to present their case coherently they should have a chance with you.
After all the promise of hope and change, not much has happened on most other fronts. This is the real problem affecting the Democrats. All those volunteers who came out for Obama and Democrats in 2006 and 2008 are going to have a hard time motivating themselves this time. But in the House of Representatives, where the biggest bloodbath is supposed to occur, a supposedly vulnerable Congressman could point out that Democrats have passed almost 300 pieces of legislation that the Senate has not acted on – yes, because of weak Democratic leadership, but primarily because of Republican obstruction.
Democrats could take heart in demographic trends that seem to be going their way: In every category you can name: age, race, economic status, geography, education, Republicans are heading further and further into minority status.
Of course, everybody knows Democrats can turn any winning situation into a loss, see Martha Coakley or Creigh Deeds. But if Democrats run aggressive candidates, who clearly articulate why they are Democrats and what’s wrong with the conservative philosophy and point out how it played out from 2000-2008, they will be fine.
Now, why would I want to cheerlead for Democrats? No one is more cognizant or despairing of their faults. But even Noam Chomsky admits that voting for the lesser of two evils is the thing to do. Now there’s a rousing campaign theme!
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.