Skip to content Skip to footer

How Tropical Deforestation and Land-Use Change Are Driving Emerging Infectious Diseases

There are about 250 known human emerging infectious diseases.

Lush rainforest vegetation surrounding a creek in Madagascar's Masoala National Park. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)

There’s already ample evidence of the ways environmental degradation can contribute to the spread of infectious diseases, and now a recent study provides an example of how the disruptions to an ecosystem caused by deforestation and other land-use change can help spread a bacterial pathogen.

There are about 250 known human emerging infectious diseases, which are those that have recently appeared within a human population or those with an incidence rate or geographic range that is rapidly increasing. Rapid urbanization in developing countries and human population encroachment are known to help drive outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases.

Mosquitoes that transmit the Zika virus, for instance, thrive in artificial habitats created by humans, including urban waste such as uncollected garbage piles or old cans, barrels, and tires that collect water and provide a breeding ground for the insects.

As noted by the authors of a recent study in the journal Science Advances, many of the known emerging infectious diseases have been traced to tropical rainforests, especially freshwater aquatic systems. The study shows that the collapse of a freshwater food-web driven by deforestation and land-use change led to the increased prevalence of a bacterial pathogen called Mycobacterium ulcerans, which causes a skin disease in humans known as Buruli ulcer.

According to the World Health Organization, Buruli ulcer has been reported in 33 countries in Africa, the Americas, Asia, and the Western Pacific. Treating the disease involves a complex process that can involve surgery and skin grafting, but even then Buruli ulcer frequently results in long-term disability. And since we have little knowledge of how Buruli ulcer is transmitted, preventive measures are lacking.

But the recent Science Advances study sheds new light on exactly how the bacteria that causes Buruli ulcer spreads and comes into contact with humans.

For the study, a team of researchers led by Aaron Morris of Imperial College London collected more than 3600 invertebrate and fish specimens from 17 freshwater sites in French Guiana, a South American nation where Buruli ulcer is endemic. They discovered that the highest concentrations of M. ulcerans appeared in species lower on the food chain, such as bottom-feeding fish and insects.

Morris and team also examined each collection site to determine how much deforestation or other environmental degradation had occurred. The sites exhibited a range of impacts due to land-use change: some were fully urbanized, while some had been converted to agricultural land and others were still pristine rainforest.

What the researchers discovered was that, up to a point, environmental degradation caused population declines amongst large predators and other species atop the food chain, which in turn meant less predation on lower-level organisms, allowing them to multiply relatively unchecked. And because those organisms are the preferred hosts for M. ulcerans, that allowed the bacteria to become more abundant, as well.

The more deforestation and land-use change that had occurred, however, the more the population density of even these lower-level hosts dropped, suggesting there is a certain range of environmental degradation in which M. ulcerans can be expected to thrive. “There’s sort of this sweet spot where you get a lot of the organisms that carry the bacteria, but as you progress to large levels of habitat destruction, then they sort of decline again,” Morris told The Washington Post.

Morris and his co-authors write that their findings could be applicable elsewhere around the globe. “As urbanization, agriculture, and deforestation intensify, notably in tropical regions of the world (which also hosts the largest number of developing countries on the planet), similar trends for other [emerging infectious diseases], as observed here for M. ulcerans, may become apparent.”

But they caution that, although their study identified a potential mechanism for the outbreak of a specific emerging disease, the “generalizability” of their results still requires further testing in order to be more definitively established.

“Because human populations have greater contact with land-use change generated by global urbanization, it is not unreasonable to predict that emergence and reemergence of infectious diseases will become more common,” they write. “We therefore recommend that more empirical evidence must be sought for mechanisms related to disease emergence in areas of anthropogenic disturbance, notably in tropical regions of the world where biodiversity (at both micro- and macroscales) can be high.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.