Is there a man or woman in America today who is willing to stand at noon in the public square and claim that demands to bomb, invade, and occupy other people’s countries have anything to do with human liberation?
If such people can be found, let them answer a few simple questions about the US invasion and occupation of Iraq.
How many Iraqis did we “liberate” from the companionship of their loved ones?
How many Iraqis did we “liberate” from dwelling in the houses and towns and the country of their birth?
How many Iraqis did we “liberate” from life on Earth?
If any American who claims to believe that indefinite continuation of the war in Afghanistan — or a US/Israeli military attack on Iran — is justified by humanitarian concerns cannot give a fact-based and intellectually coherent answer to the question of how many Iraqis have lost their lives as a result of the US invasion and occupation of Iraq, do not that person’s claims for “humanitarian” war, bombing, and occupation deserve zero credence?
To state that we cannot know how many have died is outrageously false. It is vacuously true that we cannot know exactly how many have died. But in the diverse fields of human inquiry and endeavor, there are many large numbers that are important which we cannot know exactly. If understanding the magnitude of a number is important, we do not throw up our hands and say, “we can never know.” Imagine a reference book that said, “we don’t know how many humans are alive on Earth today, because no one has counted them all.”
If we want to understand the magnitude of a large number that we cannot count, we estimate it.
And there have now been several attempts to estimate the death toll. In November 2008, Tim Lambert published the following table comparing several estimates, extrapolating the numbers to October 2008:
Survey ………………Violent deaths …..Excess deaths
ILCS ……………….. 160,000
Lancet 1 …………..350,000 ………………510,000
IFHS …………………310,000………………740,000
Lancet 2: …………..1,200,000…………..1,300,000
ORB: …………………1,200,000
If Lambert were to revisit the issue today, he would produce a table that would look something like this:
Survey ………………Violent deaths …..Excess deaths
ILCS ……………….. 180,000
Lancet 1 …………..400,000 ………………580,000
IFHS …………………350,000 ………………840,000
Lancet 2 …………..1,370,000 …………..1,480,000
ORB …………………1,370,000
These numbers are different from one another. Based on these different numbers, can we say anything meaningful about how many Iraqis have died as a result of the US invasion and occupation beginning in March 2003?
Absolutely we can. We can make the following statement with very high confidence: “Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have died as a result of the US invasion.”
So, if you happen to run into any American who claims to support the open-ended war and occupation of Afghanistan, or a US/Israeli attack on Iran, or any other demand to bomb, invade, or occupy someone else’s country based on “humanitarian” motivations, ask them to say this sentence: “Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have died as a result of the US invasion and occupation of their country.” If they can’t say this sentence, you can safely ignore anything else they have to say.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.