On Friday, the Louisiana Board of Pardons voted to clear the record of Homer Plessy, a Black man who defied a segregationist state law in the 1890s that resulted in the “separate but equal” Supreme Court ruling.
In June 1892, Plessy, who was a member of a Louisiana civil rights group called the Citizens’ Committee, sat in a whites-only train car during a trip from New Orleans to Covington, Louisiana. Despite purchasing a first-class ticket, Plessy was told to remove himself from the car. When he refused, he was dragged from the train, charged with violating the Louisiana Separate Car Act and fined $25.
When Judge John Howard Ferguson ruled the segregationist law was constitutional, Plessy appealed his case all the way to the Supreme Court. In the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson, the court affirmed the judge’s decision. That ruling established the doctrine of “separate but equal,” which allowed de jure segregation to remain in place up until the 1950s, when it was deemed an errant ruling by the Court in Brown v. Board of Education.
Plessy died in 1925. In spite of the ruling made in Brown seven decades ago, the action he took on the train car in 1892 remains part of his official criminal record.
On Friday, the state’s pardons board voted to clear Plessy’s record, citing a little-known (and never used) law called the Avery C. Alexander Act. Passed in 2006, the law allows for the pardoning of individuals who were convicted of violating past laws that were intended to enforce segregation and discrimination in the state.
“It almost makes you think it was designed for just this moment, for Homer Plessy,” said Jason Williams, the Orleans Parish District Attorney.
The pardons board decision now goes to Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards’s desk for final approval. A spokesperson for Edwards said the governor “looks forward to receiving and reviewing the recommendation of the board.”
The pardon request came after years of work from the Plessy and Ferguson Foundation, an organization led by Keith Plessy and Phoebe Ferguson, descendants of Homer Plessy and John Ferguson who have sought to undo the ruling both say was unjust and unconstitutional.
Though the impending decision to pardon Plessy is significant, it is also a symbolic gesture, one that must be followed by moves addressing the systemic and persistent racism in the justice system today.
“Not that this symbolic gesture from a conviction 128 years ago isn’t important, but we hope the Louisiana Board of Pardons/Committee on Parole is as interested in helping people who are incarcerated in 2021 for the same reasons as Mr. Plessy — unfair prosecutions and unfair laws,” read a tweet from Baton Rouge-based Trichell Law Firm, which dedicates a quarter of its work toward pro bono civil rights cases.
In an article for Truthout in October, religious scholar Adam Kotsko noted that symbolic actions do little to address the material consequences of racism and mostly serve to make white people feel better about themselves.
“The notion of racism as ‘America’s original sin’ underwrites a cycle of performative guilt and ritual repentance among white liberals, as a substitute for any concrete action,” Kotsko said.
The action to undo Plessy’s conviction also comes as dozens of state legislatures across the country — including in Louisiana — are considering (or have already passed) bills intended to ban lessons about racism in K-12 classroom settings. In some of those states, the proposed bills could forbid teachers from discussing the Supreme Court case that bears Plessy’s name.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.