It’s been four days since President Trump stood on the stage in Helsinki and pledged fealty to Russian president Vladimir Putin. Well, OK — he didn’t actually pledge fealty, he just implied it in his eagerness to please his counterpart. Perhaps this wouldn’t have seemed so obvious if he hadn’t insulted America’s closest allies in the run-up to the meeting and then maligned his own intelligence agencies as being no more reliable than Putin himself.
The immediate firestorm was fierce but it’s obvious that Republicans desperately want the president to find a way to settle this controversy and move on to the next one. Unfortunately, Trump can’t seem to help making things worse, so the fire is still burning out of control.
On Wednesday, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders set everyone on edge all over again. She failed to tamp down suspicion that Trump had really meant it when he’d said during the press conference that he thought Putin had made an “incredible offer” to allow Robert Mueller to come to Russia to interview the military officers he’d indicted — in exchange for allowing Russian prosecutors to interview Americans, including Michael McFaul, the former ambassador to Russia. People believed Trump might actually do it because, after the first meeting between the two presidents in 2017, Trump had sounded like a delighted young fanboy when Putin suggested that the two countries should create a “cybersecurity task force” to share top-secret information.
Putin & I discussed forming an impenetrable Cyber Security unit so that election hacking, & many other negative things, will be guarded..
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 9, 2017
That idea was shot down by the experts, but Trump still loves it. He and Putin brought it up again at the press conference. It’s that kind of eager-beaver gullibility that shows Trump is obtuse enough not to understand when he’s being played. Since nobody knows anything about what happened in his private chat with Putin, it’s fair to be extremely suspicious.
Sanders clarified her initial statement on Thursday, saying, “It is a proposal that was made in sincerity by President Putin, but President Trump disagrees with it.” Trump apparently saw into Putin’s soul, as George W. Bush once did, and knew he was sincere. It sure didn’t sound like Trump disagreed with him at the time although, to be fair, he probably didn’t have a clue what Putin was really suggesting.
Tellingly, after the White House issued that statement the Senate still voted 98-0 on a non-binding resolution that the United States should refuse to make its diplomats available to Russian prosecutors. Yes, they actually felt the need to put that concept to a vote.
Unfortunately, the Senate Republican majority couldn’t bring itself to vote on proposed resolutions urging the president to take a tougher stand against Russia and protect the Mueller investigation. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., did say that the Senate Banking and Foreign Relations committees would look at the possibility of further sanctions if Russia interferes in our elections again. As tepid and impotent as that is, it’s more than we’ve seen up until now.
As I mentioned here on Thursday, Republicans have eliminated election security spending in this year’s budget, and voted down Democratic efforts to restore it. Freedom Caucus member Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, currently under a cloud for failing to report sexual abuse as a wrestling coach at Ohio State, offered this pithy observation:
Rep Jim Jordan on why House R’s shot down Dem push for more election security $$: “I know what we need for safe and secure elections, and that’s voter ID.”
— Erica Werner (@ericawerner) July 19, 2018
House Republicans also declined to subpoena Trump’s State Department interpreter for a closed session on Capitol Hill to determine what was said at the Helsinki meeting, since the president refuses to tell anyone. That includes Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, who revealed in a live interview with MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell at the Aspen Security Forum that he had not been read in on the substance of the meeting, which is truly stunning even for the Trump administration.
Trump mentioned Coats by name in Helsinki and seemed peeved that the director had given a speech the previous Friday in which he reiterated that the Russians had interfered in the election and said they were doing it again. According to the Washington Post, Trump was even more irked by Coats’ post-Helsinki statement standing by the intelligence community, which Trump had just slighted on the world stage. Nonetheless, the president was persuaded it would be a problem if Coats abruptly resigned, so he praised him in an interview on Wednesday.
Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats informed on stage at Aspen Security Forum that the Trump administration has invited Vladimir Putin to the White House.
“Say that again,” he responds. https://t.co/RBdhdILVas pic.twitter.com/TZal1Xb4Yi
— ABC News (@ABC) July 19, 2018
There has been some speculation that the White House made the announcement at that moment in order to rattle Coats, whose comments were being carried live on all three cable news networks. But with this White House, it may just as easily have been the usual incompetence that made the news of a Putin invitation into an even more surreal moment than it already was.
The Post reports that administration insiders are furious with Coats for “going rogue,” so his days are likely numbered one way or the other. It’s possible that FBI Director Christopher Wray, who has run the bureau for less than a year, could be next. In his own Aspen interview, Wray didn’t deny that he had contemplated resigning in the wake of the Helsinki meeting. But we’ve seen this sort of thing before. Trump’s appointees get wobbly but always come back to the fold, at least until Trump finally orders one of his minions to fire them.
The president has apparently still told no one what was discussed in that meeting. Putin and his ministers seem to be talking freely about it, however. A Russian defense official said the two nations have come to an agreement on Syria, although the US Army general in charge of the region says he has heard nothing about it.
Putin himself reportedly told Russian diplomats that he made a proposal for a referendum in eastern Ukraine, but agreed not to mention it until Trump had a chance to “mull it over.” So of course the Russian leader mentioned it, likely in order to force Trump’s hand in this overheated environment and make him take Putin’s side.
If we didn’t know better we might think that Trump was waiting for Putin to make the details from their meeting public. Whether it’s because Trump didn’t understand what was happening and can’t ask anyone for fear of accidentally crossing the Russian president or because that was their agreement is impossible to say.
Instead of calming things down, Trump has now invited the foreign leader who ordered his military intelligence to interfere in the 2016 presidential election to visit Washington shortly before the next election. This firestorm has just had a tanker full of gasoline poured all over it. It’s going to be harder and harder for Donald Trump and his loyalists to put it out.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 7 days to add 432 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.