A public health official in Tulsa, Oklahoma, suggested this week that President Donald Trump’s campaign rally in the city last month likely caused a spike in new cases of coronavirus seen in the jurisdiction.
Trump held a campaign rally indoors at the BOK Center in Tulsa on June 20. Bruce Dart, the director of the Tulsa City-Council Health Department, explained on Wednesday that large events like Trump’s rally likely resulted in the spread of COVID-19 in the city and county since that time.
While the health department does not identify specific events or individual settings where people contracted the virus, speaking broadly, Dart said that large gatherings in recent weeks (which would include the Trump rally) “more than likely” contributed to an increase in numbers.
“In the past few days, we’ve seen almost 500 new cases, and we had several large events just over two weeks ago, so I guess we just connect the dots,” Dart explained.
On the Monday and Tuesday before Trump’s campaign rally in Tulsa took place, Tulsa County saw 172 new cases of coronavirus reported. Conversely, this week’s totals from Monday and Tuesday saw a total of 467 new cases.
Before Trump hosted his event, Dart had warned about him coming to the city, arguing it was a bad idea due to the potential harm it could cause with regard to the disease.
“I think it’s an honor for Tulsa to have a sitting president want to come and visit our community, but not during a pandemic,” Dart said the week before Trump came to Tulsa. “I’m concerned about our ability to protect anyone who attends a large, indoor event, and I’m also concerned about our ability to ensure the president stays safe as well.”
The suggestion that Tulsa’s coronavirus numbers increased because of large events in the area recently, including Trump’s rally, comes as the president’s reelection campaign is set to hold another event, this time in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, this weekend. While this event is set to take place outdoors at the Portsmouth International Airport, many have called on Republican Gov. Chris Sununu to issue an order requiring masks or facial coverings for gatherings that feature 50 people or more.
Sununu, however, has declined to issue such an order. However, while he does intend to greet Trump at the airport, Sununu himself is not planning to attend the rally.
“I’m going to meet the president as the governor, I will not be in the crowd of thousands of people,” the governor said.
Ahead of the event, the Trump campaign announced “there will be ample access to hand sanitizer and all attendees will be provided a face mask that they are strongly encouraged to wear,” but such masks will not be required of those who are at the event.
New Hampshire Democratic Party chair Ray Buckley decried the president’s decision to come to the state in the middle of a pandemic.
“Trump’s response to the COVID-19 crisis has been chaotic and woefully inadequate, resulting in thousands of Granite Staters contracting the virus and hundreds of lives lost, while causing significant damage to our state’s economy,” Buckley said after the announcement of Trump’s campaign stop. “Instead of helping our state safely recover, Trump is flying in for a political rally that will only further highlight the chaos he has caused.”
While polling has indicated that most of Trump’s own supporters would support requirements to wear a mask or facial covering, they are the political group that is least likely to do so.
According to a Farleigh Dickinson University poll conducted last month, 63 percent of those who call themselves Trump supporters said they’d be fine with mask requirements. Meanwhile, 95 percent of those who say they are critics of Trump said they’d be supportive of a mask mandate.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.