Skip to content Skip to footer

Hammered in the Senate, Democrats Must Negotiate on Tax Cuts

Washington Saturday was a picture of frustration and gridlock over government spending and taxes. But the lack of specific legislative progress also brought signs that the negotiating parties – Republicans and Democrats

Washington Saturday was a picture of frustration and gridlock over government spending and taxes.

But the lack of specific legislative progress also brought signs that the negotiating parties – Republicans and Democrats, Congress and the White House – may be headed for some sort of compromise.

Still, Republicans definitely have the upper hand – at least in the short run. Time (and the 2012 elections) will tell whether GOP lawmaker’s focus on tax breaks for the wealthy is a political winner or not. Judging by the increased grumbling on his left flank, it cannot be a happy time for President Obama – particularly in the wake of the “shellacking” he took in last month’s midterm elections.

Specifically, two Saturday votes in the Senate did not go well for Democrats.

The first would have let expire the Bush-era tax cuts for individuals with incomes above $200,000 (and for couples filing jointly and earning more than $250,000 a year). That fell seven votes short of the 60 needed to block a filibuster (including five Democrats). As he has since first running for the White House, Obama wanted to limit those tax cuts to poor and middle-class Americans – the position approved by the House earlier in the week.

The second vote Saturday would have extended the tax cuts for those making less than $1 million a year. That, too, fell seven votes short of passage.

Just back from a quick and unannounced trip to Afghanistan, Obama said, “We need to redouble our efforts to resolve this impasse in the next few days to give the American people peace of mind that their taxes will not go up on January 1.”

“I continue to believe that it makes no sense to hold tax cuts for the middle class hostage to permanent tax cuts for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans, especially when those high income tax cuts would cost an additional $700 billion that we don’t have and would add to our deficit,” Obama told reporters.

For their part, GOP leaders called the Saturday session a “dog and pony show” (Sen. Charles Grassley) and “a total waste of time” (Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell).

If anything, Democrats were even more frustrated. Sen. Charles Schumer said many in his party are prepared to fight the issue into 2011, even if it means tax cuts expire for all income levels.

But that doesn’t seem likely to happen, particularly given the resignation with which the Obama White House is facing negotiations with newly invigorated Republicans.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, and White House budget director Jacob Lew are the lead negotiators with senior House and Senate members of both parties.

It’s a situation Obama and congressional Democrats will have to get used to.

“In the end, the Republicans look certain to get what they want – extension of all the Bush tax cuts,” writes Monitor congressional correspondent Gail Russell Chaddock. “While they will remain the minority when the new Senate convenes next year, Republicans will gain six seats, meaning Democrats will need to compromise to get anything done.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 4 days to add 310 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.