A Georgia judge has ruled that the election interference case against former President Donald Trump can move forward and that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis can continue prosecuting the case, so long as Nathan Wade, a special prosecutor Willis appointed as an assistant (and with whom she had a relationship) steps down from his position.
Willis can keep Wade on the case if she chooses, but only if she removes herself from it, an option she’s not expected to take.
Trump’s team of lawyers had alleged that Willis’s and Wade’s relationship was a conflict of interest that hurt their client. Because Wade was being paid by Willis’s office, they alleged, he had an incentive to do the work asked of him in order to benefit her personally. Wade had paid for some vacations and other expenses the two had taken over the past years.
Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee ruled on Friday that either Willis or Wade could remain on the case, but not both. McAfee criticized Willis for an error in judgment, finding that her actions didn’t require her full removal from the case but that the hiring of Wade amid their relationship created an “appearance of impropriety” that would persist among outside viewers of the case.
McAfee’s decision is a technical setback for Trump’s legal team, who had sought to use Willis’s relationship with Wade as a means to get the case dismissed entirely. Trump and his lawyers “failed to meet their burden” in showing how the relationship created enough of a “conflict of interest” to result in that outcome, or to require Willis’s removal if the case moved forward, McAfee wrote in his order.
Trump can appeal the verdict, however, which will create further delays in advancing the case to an actual trial, possibly beyond the date of the 2024 presidential election, which many legal experts have pointed out is his goal in the four criminal cases currently against him.
Although unsuccessful in their request for Willis’s removal, the demand by Trump’s legal team shifted national attention away from their client and toward the district attorney, spotlighting for several weeks her relationship with Wade in a trial that is meant to focus on Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results in the state of Georgia.
Earlier this week, McAfee gave Trump a different kind of pre-trial win, dismissing six of the 41 indictment charges he and others faced, including two relating to the infamous phone conversation he had in late 2020 with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, in which Trump demanded that the state official “find” him enough votes to overturn the election result, or risk facing legal consequences.
McAfee dismissed those charges, not because it appeared that Trump and his allies didn’t engage in said illegal actions, but because he thought the prosecuting team didn’t provide specific enough charges against Trump. The judge ruled that Willis could try to convene a new grand jury to get those charges re-applied with more specific accusations, or she could appeal his ruling — although either option would, of course, result in further delays.
McAfee, however, left intact dozens of other charges against Trump that Willis will still be allowed to press forward with.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.