Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-California), who also served as a House manager in the impeachment trial of former President Donald Trump earlier this year, has filed a civil lawsuit against the former president, alleging that he was largely responsible for inciting his base of loyalists to breach the U.S. Capitol building on January 6.
Swalwell also named Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., and former lawyer Rudy Giuliani as co-defendants in the lawsuit, as both gave controversial speeches of their own in the same rally prior to the attack on the Capitol. Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Alabama) is also named as a defendant, having spoken at that rally also.
Swalwell alleges in his lawsuit that Trump and his allies used repeatedly debunked lies about November’s presidential election outcome to goad his followers into intervening at the Capitol on the day lawmakers were certifying Electoral College results of the 2020 election.
“The Defendants, in short, convinced the mob that something was occurring that — if actually true — might indeed justify violence, and then sent that mob to the Capitol with violence-laced calls for immediate action,” Swalwell’s lawsuit states.
Swalwell’s suit is the second against the former president to be filed relating to the events of January 6. Last month, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Mississippi) also filed a lawsuit against Trump, purporting that he had incited his base to disrupt the proceedings of Congress.
The lawsuit cited a little-known federal law passed in 1871 that was enacted in order to respond to violence from the Ku Klux Klan at the time. The law allows civil lawsuits to commence against those who use “force, intimidation, or threat[s]” to thwart anyone from upholding the duties of their government offices.
Swalwell’s lawsuit similarly cites the 1871 law, while also alleging the defendants broke anti-terrorism laws, and that their actions caused emotional distress on members of Congress and their staff.
“In total, six people lost their lives because of the riot, 140 officers were hurt, and scores of people were left emotionally and physically injured,” the lawsuit states.
Swalwell’s lawsuit claims Trump was acting in a personal, not official, capacity when he incited his followers to go to the Capitol that day:
His words and actions in lying about massive, coordinated fraud, improperly pressuring state legislators to overturn specific state results, seeking to undo such results through largely frivolous lawsuits, and in inciting a crowd while knowing some of his supporters were willing to react to his claims with political violence, all were meant to serve his own partisan and individual aims.
Since the attack on the Capitol by his mob of loyalists, Trump has denied that his words or actions on that day were incendiary.
“If you read my speech, and many people have done it, and I’ve seen it both in the papers, in the media, on television, it’s been analyzed, and people thought that what I said was totally appropriate,” Trump said in January.
Trump told his supporters that day the 2020 presidential election was “stolen” from them “by emboldened radical left Democrats” and “the fake news media.” He also encouraged his loyalists to go to the Capitol that very moment to voice their frustrations in person, stating that they would “never take back our country with weakness.”
While not voting in favor of indicting the former president in his impeachment trial last month, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) did say that Trump was responsible for what had happened.
“There is no question that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of that day,” McConnell said following his vote. “The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their President.”
Polling seems to indicate that a majority of Americans agree that Trump’s words were what caused his followers to act violently. In an Economist/YouGov poll conducted last month, 55 percent of respondents said they believe Trump bears “a lot” or “some” responsibility for the events of January 6. Only 37 percent said he bore only “a little” or “none” of the responsibility for the breach of the Capitol.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.