Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-California), who also served as a House manager in the impeachment trial of former President Donald Trump earlier this year, has filed a civil lawsuit against the former president, alleging that he was largely responsible for inciting his base of loyalists to breach the U.S. Capitol building on January 6.
Swalwell also named Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., and former lawyer Rudy Giuliani as co-defendants in the lawsuit, as both gave controversial speeches of their own in the same rally prior to the attack on the Capitol. Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Alabama) is also named as a defendant, having spoken at that rally also.
Swalwell alleges in his lawsuit that Trump and his allies used repeatedly debunked lies about November’s presidential election outcome to goad his followers into intervening at the Capitol on the day lawmakers were certifying Electoral College results of the 2020 election.
“The Defendants, in short, convinced the mob that something was occurring that — if actually true — might indeed justify violence, and then sent that mob to the Capitol with violence-laced calls for immediate action,” Swalwell’s lawsuit states.
Swalwell’s suit is the second against the former president to be filed relating to the events of January 6. Last month, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Mississippi) also filed a lawsuit against Trump, purporting that he had incited his base to disrupt the proceedings of Congress.
The lawsuit cited a little-known federal law passed in 1871 that was enacted in order to respond to violence from the Ku Klux Klan at the time. The law allows civil lawsuits to commence against those who use “force, intimidation, or threat[s]” to thwart anyone from upholding the duties of their government offices.
Swalwell’s lawsuit similarly cites the 1871 law, while also alleging the defendants broke anti-terrorism laws, and that their actions caused emotional distress on members of Congress and their staff.
“In total, six people lost their lives because of the riot, 140 officers were hurt, and scores of people were left emotionally and physically injured,” the lawsuit states.
Swalwell’s lawsuit claims Trump was acting in a personal, not official, capacity when he incited his followers to go to the Capitol that day:
His words and actions in lying about massive, coordinated fraud, improperly pressuring state legislators to overturn specific state results, seeking to undo such results through largely frivolous lawsuits, and in inciting a crowd while knowing some of his supporters were willing to react to his claims with political violence, all were meant to serve his own partisan and individual aims.
Since the attack on the Capitol by his mob of loyalists, Trump has denied that his words or actions on that day were incendiary.
“If you read my speech, and many people have done it, and I’ve seen it both in the papers, in the media, on television, it’s been analyzed, and people thought that what I said was totally appropriate,” Trump said in January.
Trump told his supporters that day the 2020 presidential election was “stolen” from them “by emboldened radical left Democrats” and “the fake news media.” He also encouraged his loyalists to go to the Capitol that very moment to voice their frustrations in person, stating that they would “never take back our country with weakness.”
While not voting in favor of indicting the former president in his impeachment trial last month, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) did say that Trump was responsible for what had happened.
“There is no question that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of that day,” McConnell said following his vote. “The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their President.”
Polling seems to indicate that a majority of Americans agree that Trump’s words were what caused his followers to act violently. In an Economist/YouGov poll conducted last month, 55 percent of respondents said they believe Trump bears “a lot” or “some” responsibility for the events of January 6. Only 37 percent said he bore only “a little” or “none” of the responsibility for the breach of the Capitol.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy