Skip to content Skip to footer

Florida GOP Introduces 3 New Bills to Expand DeSantis’s “Don’t Say Gay” Policies

The bills include vague “age-appropriate” guidelines that will likely stifle any discussion of gender issues even more.

Revelers celebrate on 7th Avenue during the Tampa Pride Parade in the Ybor City neighborhood on March 26, 2022, in Tampa, Florida.

Florida Republican state lawmakers are proposing a slew of new bills that would expand the state’s already restrictive laws on discussion of gender and sexuality in schools across the state.

A law signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) last year, commonly known as the “Don’t Say Gay” law in the state, puts immense restrictions on what teachers or other school employees can discuss with students regarding those topics. No teacher of students in grades K-3, for example, can discuss any kind of issue relating to gender or sexuality. For all other grades, the law requires teachers to follow a vague “age-appropriate” standard for discussing such issues.

Though teachers are technically allowed to discuss certain sexuality and gender topics, the effect of the law has stifled discussion up through high schools, as school districts have become mindful of the fact that parents or residents of districts can sue if they believe such discussions, lessons or other actions taken by districts aren’t age-appropriate.

The law has had an overwhelmingly negative effect on LGBTQ students, limiting who they can turn to, outside of their homes, if they have questions or need to talk to a trusted adult about a situation that is troubling them, such as bullying in the hallways or a difficult homelife. It also limits how straight, cisgender students can learn about these topics and become more tolerant individuals themselves through lessons or discussions.

Three new bills have been proposed in the Florida state legislature over the past few weeks, all of which expand on the regulations that have been implemented so far.

House Bill 1223 would institute many additional measures to the current “Don’t Say Gay” law. It would extend the prohibition on discussion of any topics relating to sexuality or gender from third grade to eighth grade, keeping in place the vague “age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate” restrictions on topics for high schoolers. It would also define “sex” as an “immutable biological trait,” and put restrictions on transgender students, who wouldn’t be able to use the restroom that corresponded to their gender.

The bill also gives cisgender students allowances to call their trans peers by the wrong name or pronouns without repercussion from the school, giving those students license to bully without consequence. Teachers would also be barred from asking students what their pronouns are, and would be prohibited from telling students their own pronouns.

The other two bills are similar. House Bill 1069 also redefines “sex” as being determined by a person’s “reproductive function at birth,” and adds that “reproductive roles are binary, stable, and unchangeable,” defying the scientific understanding of how gender actually works. It would also limit the teaching about the prevention of AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections (as well as health education in general), allowing such lessons to only be taught to students in grades 6-12.

Senate Bill 1320, meanwhile, also prohibits teachers or other school employees from sharing their pronouns or asking students about theirs, as well as barring the teaching of sexuality or gender identity in grades K-8.

In addition to likely creating a more stifling environment than what is already in existence in Florida schools under the original “Don’t Say Gay” law, the new bills largely disregard the scientific and educational expertise regarding gender and gender identity, including what ages experts say discussions of such topics should begin.

According to Mayo Clinic, most children understand what their own gender is around age 3, with kids, by ages 5 or 6, becoming “rigid” about their gender — including kids who may then or someday in the future be transgender or nonbinary.

Allowing children to have open conversations about gender issues, even at younger ages, is important to “foster a positive sense of self,” Mayo Clinic says.

Equality Florida Public Policy director Jon Harris Maurer lambasted the new bills, saying they appear to be pushed solely to promote DeSantis as he gears up for a likely run for the GOP nomination for president in 2024.

“This legislation is about a fake moral panic, cooked up by Governor DeSantis to demonize LGBTQ people for his own political career,” Harris Maurer said.

Community activist and former state lawmaker Carlos Guillermo Smith also derided the proposed bills.

“The provisions of Florida’s Don’t Say Gay 2.0 bill imposing state regulations of pronouns are absurd and the GOP should be embarrassed,” he wrote on Twitter, adding that Republicans should prioritize issues like housing and healthcare rather than try to regulate children’s pronouns.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.