A federal judge declined Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall’s (R) request to dismiss two lawsuits, filed by an abortion fund and health care providers, challenging his threat to prosecute organizations that “aid and abet abortions.”
“The right to interstate travel is one of our most fundamental constitutional rights,” U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson wrote in a preliminary ruling on Monday. “Alabama can no more restrict people from going to, say, California to engage in what is lawful there than California can restrict people from coming to Alabama to do what is lawful here.”
While Alabama currently has a total abortion ban on the books, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) says that the “[t]he threatened prosecutions would blatantly violate numerous fundamental constitutional rights, such as the rights to free speech, due process, and to travel freely across state lines.”
According to a July press release by the ACLU, health care providers have been forced to stop offering vital information, counseling, and practical assistance to Alabamians seeking abortion care outside of the state in fear of potential felony prosecutions after Marshall’s statements.
“In states where abortion bans are in effect, the ability of local health care providers to share information and recommendations for specific, trusted out-of-state abortion care providers, as well as information about where people can obtain financial and practical support resources to access out-of-state abortion care, is essential for helping patients to obtain a full range of vital care, and is a lifeline for patients who need abortion care,” the July press release says.
In his order, Thompson quoted Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s concurrence in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the case that overturned the constitutional right to an abortion, in which Kavanaugh warned that the “the constitutional right to interstate travel” would prohibit states from prosecuting people for going out of state to access abortion care.
Thompson’s denial of Marshall’s motion to dismiss on the “right-to-travel claim, the freedom-of-speech claim (including the argument that facilitating abortions constitutes expressive conduct), the freedom-of-association claim, and the extraterritoriality claim” means that these lawsuits can move forward.
“Today, a federal district court rejected the Alabama attorney general’s attempt to dismiss our challenge to his threats to prosecute our clients for providing information and support to those seeking to travel out of state to access legal abortion,” Meagan Burrows, senior staff attorney with the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project, said in a statement. “Today’s ruling sends a strong signal to anti-abortion politicians that their efforts to prevent pregnant people in states with bans from obtaining the help they need to access legal, out-of-state abortion care are blatantly unconstitutional.”
According to the ACLU, should Marshall have the authority to criminalize people and groups that support Alabamians’ access to abortion care out of state, pregnant people could face delays in obtaining abortions and even be forced to give birth against their will. Additionally, some Alabamians may experience deadly pregnancy complications, as Alabama has one of the nation’s highest maternal mortality rates.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.