Chicago – Across the country, from college campuses to casinos and even city parks, more lines are being drawn in the sand in the war against smokers.
Yes, I do mean the war against smokers and not the war against smoking. Because everyone knows smoking can kill, the fear of second-hand smoke is being channeled as anger onto the people who choose to do it anyway. And the schizophrenia with which this country approaches this health threat is part of the problem: We sell cigarettes legally and reap benefits from their tax revenue on one hand while funding health studies and public outreach programs to get people to stop puffing on the other.
Last month’s big cigarette story was that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration will soon require gruesome images such as late-stage cancer patients, crying babies and diseased lungs on cigarette packages to dissuade the novice smoker from making the purchase and perhaps goose those already considering quitting. Last week two more alarms rang: that one puff could kill you instantly, and that smoking in private could put non-smokers elsewhere in a building at risk.
U.S. Surgeon General Regina M. Benjamin announced that as little as one cigarette a day — or even just inhaling smoke from someone else’s cigarette — could be enough to cause a heart attack and even death. In her statement, Benjamin said, “The chemicals in tobacco smoke reach your lungs quickly every time you inhale, causing damage immediately. Inhaling even the smallest amount of tobacco smoke can also damage your DNA, which can lead to cancer.”
This was followed up by a study published in the January issue of the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics contending that smoke from the privacy of an apartment could seep through walls and ventilation systems to potentially harm non-smokers. That study found that apartment-dwelling children have 45 percent more cotinine, a marker of tobacco exposure, in their blood, compared to children who live in detached homes. The data is inspiring anti-smoking groups to promote a smoking ban in multiple-occupancy buildings.
If these studies are accurate, they are bad news for everyone — fatal to people who smoke and anyone who might ever come into contact with their death cloud, even four doors down. Makes you wonder how it can be that we haven’t all died or caught second-hand lung cancer.
Let me stop to say that I don’t smoke. I think anyone who doesn’t want to inhale fumes should have a right to clean, fresh air, I love non-smoky atmospheres in restaurants and other public places, and I believe no child under the age of 18 should ever have the opportunity to use tobacco products. But the hypocrisy surrounding the smoking conundrum, and the hatred being unfurled at smokers these days, bothers me to no end.
The estimated 46 million smokers in this country are vilified — openly called filthy, backward and stupid for smoking. They are given the evil eye, thrown farther out onto the street, and otherwise limited in public because they engage in a legal, albeit unhealthful, adult activity. If the medical studies are to be believed, smoking should be outlawed completely. Really, if one puff could kill you or give you cancer, how could our government possibly keep these products on the shelves for anyone to succumb to?
It’s because cigarette and tobacco revenues are big money — a lifeline to many states, in fact. According to the Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center, tobacco tax revenues in the U.S. have increased almost fivefold since 1977. The 2008 numbers show more than $16.5 billion worth of tax revenues collected by the 50 states. California, Texas, Michigan, New York and Pennsylvania each make more than $1 billion annually from smokers and other tobacco consumers. You’d be right to say that money isn’t worth the toll in human illness, medical cost increases and death, but how would those already cash-strapped states make up the budget shortfall?
Yes, cigarettes are unhealthy and costly to both smokers and non-smoking society in many different ways. Yet even as we intensify our efforts to cut the number of new smokers and increase the number of quitters, we must find room in the debate to hate the sin but love the sinners. Unless the government heeds its own warnings and bans all cigarette sales, let’s have a little respect for the rights of those among us who choose to light up.
Esther Cepeda’s e-mail address is estherjcepeda(at)washpost.com.
(c) 2010, Washington Post Writers Group
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.