Part of the Series
Planet or Profit
Last summer, a Truthout investigation revealed that federal regulators had approved the use of fracking technology on offshore oil platforms in the Pacific Ocean. Environmental groups are now taking legal action challenging the offshore fracking approvals under federal law.
The Center for Biological Diversity filed a “notice of intent to sue” with federal regulators on December 4 alleging they violated federal law by rubber-stamping approvals for fracking operations in the Santa Barbara Channel without reviewing and revising federal drilling plans and evaluating the potential impacts that fracking could have on the marine environment.
Regulators also failed to consult state coastal authorities and the public before approving the frack jobs, according to the filing.
To see more stories like this, visit “Planet or Profit?”
The Center said it would sue the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), the two federal agencies in the Interior Department that regulate offshore oil and gas drilling in deep waters, in federal court if they fail to respond with a plan to suspend offshore fracking operations and come into legal compliance within 60 days of the filing.
The Center’s legal threat came just one day after Santa Barbara-based Environmental Defense Center (EDC) filed a lawsuit against BOEM and BSEE for failing to provide public or environmental reviews of 51 permits and permits modifications allowing oil companies to use fracking and acid injection techniques to stimulate oil production from old wells in the Santa Barbara Channel.
The groups have won lawsuits on similar legal grounds in the past. Spokespeople for BSEE and BOEM did not respond to requests for comment from Truthout by the time this article was published.
Little was publically known about offshore fracking until last year, when a series of investigative reports by Truthout revealed that federal regulators had approved fracking operations on oil platforms in the Pacific Ocean more than a dozen times in the past two decades, including at least four fracking jobs last year.
Environmental groups would later discover that about 200 wells have been fracked off the coast of California, mostly from oil platforms in waters regulated by the state.
The revelations caused an uproar in California, where activists organized protests against offshore fracking and the powerful California Coastal Commission launched an investigation into the so-called “enhanced recovery” techniques like fracking and acidizing, used to stimulate oil production from old wells by forcing water and chemicals below the sea floor to break up rock.
Internal documents released under the Freedom of Information Act to Truthout and environmental groups revealed that federal regulators had approved fracking jobs known as “frac-packs” in the Santa Barbara Channel, with simple permit modifications that were “categorically excluded” from environmental impact reviews.
In its legal filing, the Center argues that these exclusions violated federal laws requiring regulators to take a “hard look” at the environmental consequences of their actions. The EDC’s lawsuit also challenges the categorical exclusions as unlawful.
Internal documents also show that regulators scrambled to understand the scope and details of the so-called “frac-pack” operations, including the rules surrounding wastewater disposal, as they responded to information requests from Truthout and other investigators.
In the past, federal regulators and the industry have said that offshore frac-packs have a good safety record and do not require environmental impact reviews.
“Frac-pacs” are smaller than the hydraulic fracturing operations that have ignited a national controversy onshore, but environmentalists say they still pose a threat to sea otters, blue whales and other marine life in the Santa Barbara Channel, where fracking has occurred in an area that is also a proposed marine wildlife reserve.
“The federal government’s turning a blind eye as offshore fracking threatens to poison our beautiful beaches and coastal waters,” said Miyoko Sakashita, an attorney and director of the center’s oceans program. “We need offshore fracking stopped immediately before chemical contamination or an oil spill devastates California’s coastal communities and kills sea otters and other endangered marine wildlife.”
The center points out that the oil industry has federal permission to dump 9 billion gallons of wastewater, which can include fracking chemicals, into the ocean each year. Some fracking chemicals are toxic to marine life, according to analysis conducted by the Center for Biological Diversity.
In response to petitions from environmentalists, the Environmental Protection Agency in January issued new rules requiring oil platforms in the Pacific region to disclose the volume and chemical makeup of any fracking wastewater that they dump into the ocean.
Sometimes fracking wastewater is injected back into underground wells, and underground wastewater injection has been linked to earthquakes in Ohio, Oklahoma and other states. Environmentalists in California remain concerned about wastewater injection both onshore and offshore, where many injection wells lie near active seismic faults.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.