Rio De Janeiro – Behind every initiative to form an association of nations, there are “strong economic and commercial interests,” said Brazilian Foreign Minister Celso Amorim.
Members of the business communities of Brazil, China, India, Russia and South Africa wasted no time in stating loudly and clearly what they were there for, ahead of the speeches their presidents will deliver at summit meetings this week.
Energy, information technology, infrastructure, food and agribusiness are the sectors that some 400 commercial delegates identified as priorities in terms of business opportunities.
These points of interest were defined at a meeting Wednesday of business leaders from the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) and IBSA (India, Brazil and South Africa) groups, in which economic statistics mattered more than country initials.
According to documents distributed at the IBSA-BRIC Business Forum in Brasilia, nearly 50 percent of global economic growth between 2000 and 2008 took place in the BRIC nations, and by 2014 this share is expected to reach 61 percent.
Nearly half the world’s population lives in the BRIC countries, which occupy more than one-quarter of the planet’s land area and produce 15 percent of global GDP.
Together, our countries have tremendous strength, said India’s Minister of Commerce and Industry, Anand Sharma, in the upbeat tone shared by all participants.
BRIC and IBSA ensured global recovery from the 2008 recession earlier than expected, he said.
China, India and South Africa are net consumers of energy, while Brazil and Russia are exporters, said Zhang Wei, Vice Chairman of the China Council for Promotion of International Trade (CCPIT).
“We could complement each other” to guarantee, for example, demand and supply “of energy for our countries,” he said.
The Chinese delegate also mentioned other strategic sectors, like grain production to safeguard food security, an equally crucial matter for these emerging countries with large populations.
Zhang proposed a system for exchanging agricultural information between the countries in the groups, to prevent problems like soaring food prices.
According to a report by the Brazilian government’s Institute for Applied Economic Research (IPEA), in the next 50 years the BRIC group of countries could overtake the G6 (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States) as the main engines of the global economy.
However, the IPEA report stresses that achieving this will require overcoming structural economic differences between members of the group.
A large share of Brazil’s economy is taken up by consumption in the domestic market, while Russia’s development is based on exports of energy commodities.
India took advantage of a boom in services exports to grow at a high rate and increase its competitiveness in other sectors, while China’s development has been led by exports of manufactured goods and high rates of investment, and its domestic consumer market is undergoing rapid growth, the report says.
These different models of development lead to different patterns of insertion into the world market, according to IPEA. But Sharma said they could do so in an integrated fashion.
The Indian minister said strong points of each country were Brazil’s biofuel development, China’s technology, South Africa’s energy sector, India’s nuclear energy and Russia’s competitiveness in minerals and oil.
“Synergy” was the word chosen by the head of the Department for International Cooperation of Russia’s Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Sergey Vasiliev. “Together, we can only win,” he said.
This was the first time a meeting of business leaders from both groups of countries has been held.
BRIC, an acronym coined in 2001 by economist Jim O’Neill, brings together four emerging countries with large territories and populations, whose economies have grown at impressive rates in recent years.
The India-Brazil-South Africa Dialogue Forum (IBSA), formally established by the Brasilia Declaration in 2003, is a coordinating mechanism to promote dialogue between countries and regions of the global South, and joint cooperation on economic and other issues of international importance.
These groups of countries, according to South Africa’s Minister for Trade and Industry Rob Davies, have brought about a “tectonic change” in the world economic order.
In 2009, China overtook the United States as Brazil’s main trading partner, with 12.9 percent of Brazil’s total foreign trade.
Brazilian exports to China were worth just over 20 billion dollars in 2009, a 23 percent increase on 2008.
And this year, China became the third largest foreign investor in Brazil’s productive sector, in key areas such as oil, metal ores and telecommunications and with future prospects in infrastructure.
These tremendous shifts, according to Foreign Minister Amorim, are tokens of changes in the global balance of economic power that will also be reflected in the world of politics.
Visit IPS news for fresh perspectives on development and globalization.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy