In 2013, state legislators continue to push laws that would make it harder for eligible American citizens to vote. At the same time, others are pressing measures to improve elections.
Below you will find a regularly-updated, comprehensive roundup of where restrictive laws were introduced, where they are pending, where they are active, and where they have passed thus far.
Click here to read a detailed summary of all passed and pending restrictive legislation proposed nationwide in the 2013 state legislative sessions (as of April 5th).
Numbers Overview
Since the beginning of 2013,
- At least 80 restrictive bills were introduced in 31 states.
- Of those, 66 restrictive bills are still pending in 26 states.
- Of those, 27 restrictive bills are currently active in 14 states, in that there has been legislative activity beyond introduction and referral to committee (such as hearings or votes).
- Two states have already passed 3 restrictive bills this session — Virginia and Arkansas both passed restrictive legislation requiring a photo ID to vote, and Virginia passed legislation making voter registration harder.
But there’s good news, too. More than 150 affirmative reform bills have been introduced across the country, including measures to expand early voting, and modernize the voter registration process through online registration and other steps. A more detailed analysis of refVoting Restrictions Passed in 2013
Arkansas:
- Photo ID required to vote (legislature overrode gubernatorial veto)
Virginia:
- Photo ID required to vote (signed into law)
- Restrictions on Third Party Registration (signed into law)
Summary of Pending Restrictive Voting Laws (see a detailed list of passed/pending 2013 bills)
- Identification laws
- Proof of citizenship laws. At least 9 states have introduced legislation requiring proof of citizenship, such as a birth certificate, to register or vote.[2]
- Making voter registration harder. At least 9 states have introduced bills to end Election Day and same-day voter registration, limit voter registration mobilization efforts, and reduce other registration opportunities.[3] Virginia has passed a law restricting voter registration drives.
- Reducing the early voting period. At least 7 states have introduced bills to reduce their early voting or in-person absentee voting periods.[4]
- Making it harder to restore voting rights. At least 3 states introduced legislation that would further restrict the right to vote to persons with criminal convictions.[5]
Pushback Against Voting Restrictions
On April 2, 2013, voters in Wisconsin overwhelmingly supported an advisory referendum to keep the state’s highly-popular same-day registration law.
On March 21, 2013, the New Hampshire House voted to stop implementation of more restrictive voter ID requirements pending an impact study by state officials.
On March 5, 2013, the Florida House voted to reverse the early voting restrictions it adopted prior to the 2012 election.
[5] North Carolina, Maine, Virginiaorm bills is forthcoming.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.