To forestall the nation’s ongoing plunge into financial devastation as some crucial relief programs expire and others are recklessly terminated by the Trump administration, economists are calling for a $3 trillion debt-financed coronavirus stimulus package that includes enhanced unemployment benefits, robust fiscal aid to state and local governments, nutrition assistance, and other safety net expansions.
In a detailed memo released Tuesday morning amid a backdrop of surging hunger, a looming eviction crisis, and an intensifying pandemic that has taken more than 250,000 lives in the U.S., Economic Policy Institute research director Josh Bivens implores Congress to “use debt, go big, and stay big, and be very slow when turning off fiscal support.”
Pointing to federal government’s timid response to the financial collapse of 2008-2009 as a cautionary tale, Bivens argued that “roughly $3 trillion in debt-financed fiscal support now, with the first $2 trillion hitting the economy between now and mid-2022,” is necessary to avoid another crushingly slow recovery and “ensure a return to a high-pressure, low-unemployment labor market by mid-2022.”
“The Senate’s failure to provide crucial relief and recovery aid has left families without a lifeline and will severely damage prospects for recovery,” Bivens said in a statement. “Policymakers must prioritize a high-pressure labor market characterized by low unemployment and strong public investments.”
Specifically, Bivens calls on Congress to approve a relief package containing, at minimum:
- A $600-per-week federal boost to unemployment benefits until mid-2022;
- $500 billion at an annualized rate in aid to state and local governments;
- $100 billion at an annualized rate for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and rental assistance; and
- “Public investments in early child care and education and in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions that ramp up immediately and reach peak levels of $400 billion annually by the fourth quarter of 2021.”
Emphasizing the importance of funding the relief package with debt rather than taxation, Bivens writes that “the point of federal spending now is to boost aggregate demand growth (spending by households, businesses, and governments), so financing this support with taxes would make it less effective.”
Bivens also stressed the need for sustained fiscal support instead of relief that expires before the economy has fully recovered.
“Policymakers should not phase out funding too quickly and must continue fiscal support through the end of 2024,” said Bivens. “We have to be careful not to think of this as jumpstarting an engine and instead think of it like towing a car out of a rough patch to smoother ground. If large fiscal support is removed quickly, the fiscal contraction can overwhelm private sources of growth and tip the economy back into recession.”
A comprehensive blueprint for relief and real recovery, by @joshbivens_DC @EconomicPolicy https://t.co/0mSM386eyM pic.twitter.com/mYVR48faDf
— John Schmitt (@jschmittwdc) November 24, 2020
While the economic case for a strong relief package appears unimpeachable — officials at the Federal Reserve have issued similar calls for a large stimulus — major political obstacles remain in the way of passage of bold legislation, particularly during a lame-duck session in which austerity-obsessed Republicans remain in control of the Senate.
President-elect Joe Biden has voiced support for passage of coronavirus relief during the lame-duck period before he takes office in January — when Democrats have an opportunity to take back the Senate with a pair of Georgia run-offs — but recent talks between Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Democratic leaders have yielded little indication of progress toward an agreement.
“People across the country are going hungry, Covid is set to explode, and Mitch McConnell dismissed the Senate last week,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) tweeted Monday, referring to the Republican leader’s decision to adjourn the Senate for Thanksgiving recess without passing additional relief.
“I don’t know how these people can sleep at night,” said the New York Democrat. “I really don’t.”
Since Congress passed the $3.5 trillion CARES Act in March, persistent Republican obstruction has prevented another large spending package from advancing despite deteriorating economic conditions and soaring coronavirus cases nationwide. On December 26, the day after Christmas, an estimated 12 million Americans will lose unemployment insurance if Congress fails to extend key CARES Act jobless programs.
“Senate Republicans are failing the American people,” said Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.). “Families will not be able to survive the holiday season and some of the darkest days of this pandemic without relief.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.