An American non-profit organization, the Institute for Postmodern Development of China, made possible my attendance at a recent conference in Beijing, China.
The Beijing conference was no typical academic conference full of abstractions and jargon. Instead, it was a continuing Chinese discussion on the values of ecological civilization. Yes, indeed, ecological civilization!
Guo Moruo Memorial Museum, Beijing, China. (Photo: Evaggelos Vallianatos)
However, these eco-political discussions have been taking place in a city, Beijing, and a country, China, which are the workshops of the world. There’s nothing ecological about that.
The first three days in Beijing, I could not see the sky. The white-brown haze engulfed the skyscrapers and Beijing with otherworldliness. The streets were full of cars and taxis.
Downtown Beijing. (Photo: Evaggelos Vallianatos)
I stayed in two hotels. One was attractive. Each hotel building was modest in size and had the feeling of community. I walked a long corridor every morning for breakfast. The corridor was an exhibit of fashionable clothing and art. The cafeteria was full of foreigners. The other hotel was a skyscraper. From my twelfth story room I watched modern Beijing: a gigantic city of concrete built on the models of New York and Chicago.
Forbidden City, Beijing (Photo: Evaggelos Vallianatos)
Eventually, I saw the sun and Beijing became friendlier. I noticed trees on both sides of highways and city streets. I even found a fruit stand very close to my hotel. But my greatest discovery was seeing buildings and museums preserving ancient Chinese culture and architecture. Once in such rare surroundings, like the Guo Moruo Memorial Museum and the Madame Sun Yatsen (Soong Ching Ling) Museum, I felt like I was in the midst of Greek antiquities. The beautiful buildings and the gardens gave me esthetic pleasure and brought me close to Chinese history and the natural world.
A friend and I used the convenient and clean Beijing subway to visit the fabulous Forbidden City, the governing palaces of twenty-four emperors of the Ming and Qing dynasties lasting from the early fifteenth to the early twentieth centuries. Thousands of Chinese filled the large courtyards between the royal palaces. I had the sensation this was more than a museum. This was a place of history, respect for ancient Chinese civilization and a temple of worship.
Persimmon village, periphery of Beijing. (Photo: Evaggelos Vallianatos)
My friend and I also passed through the modern center of Chinese government, the immense Tian’anmen Square or Gate of Heavenly Peace. We then sampled the incomparable Chinese food: a feast of fish, rice, and vegetables.
I also had the opportunity to visit two villages on the periphery of Beijing. A professor of rural sociology from the China Agricultural University drove a couple of Chinese colleagues and me to his brother’s six-acre persimmon farm. I ate a couple of persimmons, red in color and soft as large heirloom tomatoes, and tasted ambrosia, the food of the gods.
(Photo: Yuan Hongcheng)
The peasant farmer and his father were self-sufficient in food. They said they had a good life on the land. They sold their fruit to city people and Beijing grocery stores. Their affection for their farm was strong; it had come down to them from their ancestors. When I said I was in China for a conference on ecological civilization, they smiled and said the Chinese had deep passion for the land.
Farm, Horticultural village. (Photo: Evaggelos Vallianatos)
The other village I visited is a horticultural paradise. Its trademark is the humble cabbage. A large statue of the cabbage surrounded by lotus flowers and statues of farm animals adorn the entrance to the village. I saw a series of green houses growing tomatoes, mushrooms, and other vegetables. This is a village where the land is held in common by all peasants. The president of the village explained how each family does work in a spirit of equity and justice. He spoke eloquently about farming and defended rural civilization. Then he treated us to great food.
Dates drying in the sun, Persimmon Village. (Photo: Evaggelos Vallianatos)
It’s this village reality – the Chinese peasants’ deep passion for land – that makes sense of any discussion in China about constructing or reinventing ecological civilization.
Like the United States, China embarked on its modernization by wrecking rural society. The Marxists were just as ruthless as the capitalists. But, fortunately, China started much later than the United States in its path of modernity and industrialization. This means hundreds of millions of peasants are still peasants in China.
Green houses, Horticultural village, periphery of Beijing. (Photo: Evaggelos Vallianatos)
While China has embraced industrialized agriculture to some degree, there’s still room in China for the protection of rural society. That is the reason that Chinese debate the advantages of ecological-rural civilization. We heard several farmers explain why they do what they do. We also heard stories of saving villages from extinction. The difficulties, however, persist. Young people keep moving to the cities. Peasant land becomes real estate. Entire villages become cities.
Cabbage statue in a bowl of lotus flowers, Horticultural village. (Photo: Evaggelos Vallianatos)I defended China’s traditional farming and ecological civilization at several universities in Beijing. I spoke at the China Agricultural University, the Minzu University of China, the Beijing Normal University and the China University of Political Science and Law. In each case, I praised the talent and perseverance of China’s rural people in raising food and protecting the natural world. My modest proposal was to introduce agro-ecological science to further strengthen the food self-sufficiency and food security of China. This is good for China and the entire world.
Ecological science confirms the science and wisdom of peasant farming. This means there’s no need for converting peasant land to the deleterious practices of industrialized agriculture. Peasant farmers compete nicely with large industrialized farmers. Their practices are gentle on the land. They grow a tremendous variety of crops. They do not pollute the environment. The food they raise is nutritious. This makes ecological civilization possible.
Such a prospect could open the path not taken: merge traditional agrarian knowledge with ecology to feed ourselves and prevent additional deterioration of ecosystems.
China has started this important discussion. We must do the same thing. Deep passion for the land is a universal phenomenon.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.