The Democratic chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee said Tuesday that he is not ready to ditch the arcane tradition that has given individual Republican lawmakers veto power over nominees for federal court seats in their home states.
“We’re not at that point yet,” Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) told HuffPost when asked if he’s considering scrapping the so-called “blue slip courtesy” — a non-binding rule that Republicans tossed aside for circuit court nominees when they last controlled the Senate.
When a senator returns a blue slip, they are indicating they will allow a judicial nomination to proceed. Earlier this month, Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.) announced she would not be returning a blue slip for Scott Colom, who President Joe Biden nominated to serve on the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi.
But Hyde-Smith’s decision, which effectively tanked Colom’s nomination even though he had bipartisan support in the Senate, wasn’t enough for Durbin to abandon the blue slip process — though he said earlier this week that “her conduct and the timing of her decision have made it extremely difficult” to preserve the tradition.
On top of the extended and indefinite absence of Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Durbin’s continued adherence to the blue slip rule has allowed Republicans to dramatically slow the judicial confirmation process, leaving open dozens of vacancies as right-wing judges they’ve approved in recent years wreak havoc across the country.
In remarks during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday, Durbin said the blue slip process “has a long history, but there have been instances of success and failure.”
“We have an illustration of success today,” Durbin said, noting that three Biden nominees received blue slips from senators who represent their home states, including Sens. John Kennedy (R-La.) and Bill Cassidy (R-La.).
But as HuffPost’s Jennifer Bendery noted, Durbin “has so many reasons to nix” the non-binding rule, something he can do unilaterally.
“Democrats returned more than 130 blue slips during the Trump admin, confirming 84 district judges in states with at least one or two Dem senators,” Bendery wrote on Twitter. “More than two years into the Biden admin, Republicans have returned 13 blue slips. That’s as of last month.”
“Progressive judicial groups are practically shouting from the mountaintops to ditch blue slips,” Bendery continued. “Republicans did it for years with Trump’s court picks, as Dems fumed from the sidelines. The result? Trump confirmed a massive [number] of right-wing ideologues to lifetime court seats.”
Chris Kang, the chief counsel for Demand Justice, told Bendery that if Durbin refuses to “reform the outdated blue slip tradition,” he is endorsing “the worst kind of extreme Republican obstructionism.”
The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to consider 13 Biden judicial nominees during a hearing scheduled for Thursday.
Durbin said during Tuesday’s hearing that he hopes Republicans and Democrats on the judiciary panel can “try to find common ground,” remarks that came shortly before the GOP blocked Democrats’ request to temporarily replace Feinstein on the committee as she recovers from shingles.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) objected to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s (D-N.Y.) unanimous consent request to replace Feinstein with Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.), saying, “This is about a handful of judges that you can’t get the votes for.”
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who has urged Feinstein to resign, said in response to the GOP’s obstruction that “the ball is now back in Senator Feinstein’s court to provide a specific timeline of when she can cast votes on judiciary to confirm President Biden’s judges.”
“Every day she is not on judiciary is hurting our ability to confirm another judge who will protect women’s rights and voting rights,” Khanna told NBC News. “I hope more will choose democracy over decorum and speak out about what is painfully obvious. It’s time for Sen. Feinstein to step aside to have a dignified conclusion to her public service career.”
Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One
Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.
Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.
Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.
As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.
And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.
In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.
We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.
We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $145,000 in one-time donations and to add 1489 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.
Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.
If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!
With gratitude and resolve,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy