Last Wednesday, I was fielding questions in a journalism class at the University of Kansas, when one of the students asked about Arizona’s new immigration law.
Passed with the governor’s blessing, the law makes it a state crime for immigrants not to carry documents proving they are here legally. It requires the police to demand the paperwork of anyone who triggers a “reasonable suspicion” of being “an alien who is unlawfully present in the United States.”
In other words, Arizona has become a police state. Adults who aren’t white – and let’s be clear: they’re not talking about Hungarian chefs or Irish garment workers here – had better be able to whip out papers round-the-clock to prove they have a legal right to be here. Otherwise it’s “adios, aliens.”
Do I care about that? The student wanted to know.
“I do,” I said. “Here’s why.”
I pointed to a brown-skinned student. “Because you might look like a Mexican.” I pointed to another brown-skinned student. “And you might look like a Mexican.”
I kept pointing:
“And you.”
“And you.”
“You, too.”
I pointed to a young white man with jet-black hair, dark eyes and a five o’clock shadow. “With a tan, you might look like a Mexican, too.”
The room was silent. All of a sudden, a mean-spirited law targeting brown-skinned immigrants in Arizona felt a lot more personal for people of color in Kansas.
Cleveland lawyer David Leopold has been representing immigrants across the country since the early 1990s. He is the president-elect of the American Immigration Lawyers Association in Washington, D.C. He is also the son of a Holocaust survivor.
“I don’t make these comparisons lightly,” he said last week. “This Arizona law is like the Nuremberg Laws, which stripped Jews of their rights. This time, the law is aimed at Latinos.”
It doesn’t take much to trigger “reasonable suspicion,” he said. “All you have to do, in the presence of police officers, is have an accent or avoid eye contact. Or maybe you start zigzagging to avoid crossing their path. Now they have reason to suspect you aren’t a citizen, and they can demand you provide proof on the spot.”
Leopold rattles off other possible scenarios: A neighbor calls the police and claims that someone living two doors down is an illegal immigrant. A school crossing guard notices a child who does not speak English well. A columnist with a Latino name writes something bad about a mayor.
The law is also unfair to police officers, Leopold said.
“It puts them in a horrible position. If they enforce the state law, they are breaking federal immigration law. If they don’t enforce it, private citizens can sue.”
Curiously, the law completely ignores those American citizens who offer the major incentive to those millions of undocumented workers crossing our borders: employers.
Alas, business owners are a little harder to round up on sight. So many white people, and you know how we all look alike. Why, the only way you could catch these guys is by enforcing existing laws and showing up at their places of business, where, on any given day, untold thousands of undocumented workers are earning the lowest wages in America.
Why expend all that effort to investigate and prosecute when it’s so much easier and cheaper to go after the defenseless? No money for a big-name attorney, no resources to represent themselves, no yammering about due process. Just round ’em up, rip ’em away from their families and ship ’em off.
Why does this sound so horribly familiar? Historically speaking, I mean.
Never mind. I’m sure it’s just me.
The Obama administration is poised to challenge the Arizona law as unconstitutional. Legal scholars, even some who are appalled by the new law, aren’t sure the challenge will succeed.
What is certain is that our country is full of young people like the ones I met in Kansas. They are not blinded by the fears and prejudices of their parents’ generation. They don’t need everyone to look and sound just like them. And one day soon, they will be the ones in charge.
So change may be slow, and change may be plodding.
But of this I’m sure: Change is definitely coming.
Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and essayist for Parade magazine.
Copyright 2010 Creators.com
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We’re presently working to find 1500 new monthly donors to Truthout before the end of the year.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy