Washington – Herman Cain's repeated attempts to brush aside sexual harassment charges are faltering and his once high-flying presidential campaign is likely to suffer, according to neutral Republicans.
Cain had managed to tread water for more than a week after news reports first surfaced of two anonymous charges of sexual harassment made when he led the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s. But when Sharon Bialek went public Monday to say he'd once groped her, the story started to seriously threaten Cain's public support.
“He was already slipping before these stories came out. This will accelerate his decline,” Republican pollster Whit Ayres said.
<!— story_feature_box.comp —><!— /story_feature_box.comp —>
“Now we see Cain supporters having pause,” Iowa Republican analyst Craig Robinson added. “He can no longer laugh it up. This is serious, serious stuff.”
“My sense is he's dropping like a rock,” South Carolina Republican strategist J. David Woodard said.
In his latest attempt to stem the controversy, Cain scheduled a news conference for 5 p.m. EST Tuesday. His campaign also put out an aggressive statement titled “Who Is Sharon Bialek,” detailing six lawsuits over financial matters in which she's been a defendant.
Cain has denied all allegations of sexual harassment, and his defenders are challenging the truthfulness of Bialek and her publicity-hungry attorney, Gloria Allred.
Late Monday, Cain issued a statement challenging the news media to find out whether Bialek had been paid to accuse him. Conservative talk radio and TV hosts also challenged the woman. On Fox News, Sean Hannity labeled the story “Anatomy of a Smear.” Guest analyst Dick Morris charged repeatedly that Bialek was doing it for money.
Morris, caught in a 1996 scandal of his own with a call girl, offered no evidence that Bialek was paid. She's denied receiving any money.
Cain already was starting to suffer some erosion of support before the stories broke. Ayres said Cain's support — while still high — had dropped in some polls and in states such as Iowa in the week before.
“It was pretty clear he did not have the level of knowledge that we normally expect in the leader of the free world,” Ayres said. “Republicans really liked the guy, saw him as a huge American success story. But very few Republicans could really, truly see him in the Oval Office.”
Still, Cain was able to survive the first week of reports that the National Restaurant Association had paid to settle two cases of sexual harassment allegations made against him when he was the group's CEO, in large part because the charges were first leveled in the news media.
“It is the nature of conservatives and the tea party to be highly skeptical about the news media,” conservative strategist Keith Appell said.
“This is typical media bias,” said Jennifer Ennenbach, a spokeswoman for the St. Louis Tea Party. “They found this unknown woman who has come out of the woodwork with this story.”
But Cain's responses for days were ham-handed, with changing details and contradictions. That served to keep the story alive in a media frenzy akin to the one earlier this year when former Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y., was caught sending sexually suggestive photos of himself to women.
It also reflected the fact that Cain, a novice at presidential politics, has a small campaign staff, which also has scant experience.
Then Bialek put a face on the charges, and provided details for the developing story.
“Names, faces and especially contradictions are what give these stories legs,” Appell said. “That has happened one too many times for the Cain campaign.”
That Bialek was represented by the celebrity-seeking Allred could lead some Republicans to look skeptically at the accusation. “Some people wonder who's paying Gloria Allred,” Appell said. “Although I do think Sharon Bialek was believable.”
Potentially worse, Bialek and the anonymous earlier women reinforced one another. The first women refused to go public with their stories, but they did file their complaints at the time. Bialek never filed a complaint — she didn't work at the association at the time — but she did state her charge in public and in detail.
“The problem with these allegations from the start was, if someone comes forward and puts a face on it and can discuss details, it gets to be a really messy, messy story,” said Robinson, the editor of The Iowa Republican website and a former political director of the Iowa Republican Party.
(David Goldstein contributed to this article.)
© 2011 McClatchy-Tribune Information Services
Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy